I'm really appreciative that you took the time to write this theory of emanations, and to affirm your oneness with Bartholomew. Given your depth of study, I hope you don't mind my asking questions to see where such realization takes us.

I'm interested in knowing, is anyone else on earth right now "one from which the name of the disciple of Yeshua known as Bartholomew was derived from"? Obviously if there's only one we should pay great attention to the phenomenon, and if there's more than one we should aspire to match the phenomenon, so I'd like to know which.

stop embracing division and start embracing unity

Excellent!

We could live in peace and harmony, even in our differences if only we would give up the conflict and embrace living in peace and harmony, rejecting those who say it's not possible; those who seek to keep us divided and want us divided.

Great; how, without conflict or division, does one distance from and create boundaries against and reject those who say peace is impossible? Healthy boundaries without division, I'll need to think about what that could mean.

To succeed in something and give birth to life, wholeness, and harmony we must first believe such a state is possible and direct our entire Body, Mind, and Soul towards achieving such a state, never looking back and embracing the old ways that bring death and division.

Those who claim to believe in God and promote the concept of the importance of having faith, saying that with God all things are possible will often say that being perfect is impossible for people to achieve and thus display their lack of faith in the basic implications of the common beliefs they hold on to, even though their sacred text calls them to such a state.

God doesn't dwell in man's reason that man builds up claiming that it's God's truth and that salvation is found through their institutions by believing this or that thing, or by having faith in this or that event.

Affirmed!

Jesus is an allegorical symbolic portrayal of what we are to become ourselves

So, does that mean that this "Christ" we are to become was also modeled uniquely by the paradigm of whatever living person contributed the most to getting the Jesus narrative transmitted, whether that person was Yeshua or Bartholomew or someone else?

It is so that one stuck in a negative cycle that leads to death will see death as life, and view life as death being convinced they see the truth

Does that mean that if a person claims that the spectrum measures only units of death and that there are no units of life, this is less true and life-affirming than the one who claims units of life and no units of death, such that there's a qualitative difference that can be agreed on regardless of whether one values life (connection to Source) or values death (disconnection from Source)?

a true non-existent type of annihilation cannot happen.

Insightful.

There exists, realities which we are unable to know

Then how do you know to say that, unless you mean we are unable to know perfectly what we can know partially?

The first incompleteness theorem states that no consistent system of axioms whose theorems can be listed by an effective procedure (i.e. an algorithm) is capable of proving all truths about the arithmetic of natural numbers.

Wouldn't we conclude then that whatever is capable of proving all truths must not be algorithmically listable (i.e. it must be infinite), a logos that transcends systematic logic? It seems to me the logos must transcend both logic and illogic (though there is a difference) for it to be monality.

Looking forward to your continued thoughts.