Symbols are not corrupted if they are created purely and used purely. If it were possible for a minority to corrupt a word used by the majority by claiming it has a new offensive meaning, the minority would have undue power to modify language. The majority must simply maintain the purity of the original meaning and not abrogate it due to manipulative, invented claims.
God created cubes (e.g. plant cells) and they are not evil in themselves. God specifically ordered that Moses had the Holiest Place built as a cube shape.
The hexagram and hexagon first appear in 23rd-century BC Armenia as a generic geometric polygram device and are not evil in themselves.
The hexagram hexagon is not automatically a "cube of Saturn" because it has many other meanings.
You are correct that satanism is saturnism and titanism. However, related names like Titus (a Bible book) are not evil in themselves.
You are correct that Saturday is named after Saturn, as all days have been named after heavenly bodies in many languages. However, naming days of the week is not evil in itself, and using the English names is a subject on which different consciences rule differently. I generally, but not rigorously, use the 3-letter abbreviations for weekdays as a compromise.
Shabbath is not Saturday, it is the day from Fri sundown to Sat sundown, which is always distinguished. Shabbath is not evil in itself, and Charlie Kirk has recently championed the original Sabbath for Christians.
Since cubes are not evil in themselves, putting Scriptures in an ornamental cube to be worn is not evil in itself, and is a literalist reading of Moses, which is Christian Scripture. Jesus didn't say not to wear cubes, he specifically said not to make the cubes extra large, implying that he permitted the wearing of Scriptures if it wasn't for attention-getting purposes.
The cube of Mecca is based on earlier cubical Arabic shrines, which can be inferred to be copies of the cubes of Moses, Solomon, and Zerubbabel, so the shape as a sanctuary is not evil in itself.
The hexagram was never "the star of Remphan". I showed that the most likely original meaning of star of Remphan (Rephaim or Titans) was Nehushtan. Several symbols could be attested as being "a star of Remphan", such as the crucifix itself when misused, the rods of Aesclapius and Hermes, the dollar sign, the T-and-O symbol, the uroboros, some I forgot, and because of its recent association the hexagram (not by semiotic tradition but by reassignment).
Therefore satanism is only limited to knowing pagan use of a symbol that has known pagan connotations: it cannot be ascribed to unknowing use or unknown connotations.
Your first link is solely about, well, insignificant reflections on 67.
Your second link refreshes the above, while also adding the map of Saturn. The fact that a hexagonal field was recently discovered on Saturn, obviously created by God, does not mean that satan has any special rights in the hexagon.
Your third link illustrates cube and black-cube art as well as referring to rings of pilgrims in Mecca. I do not know the origins of the various sculptures so it is possible some of them are intended as satanic symbols. The tradition of encircling seven times comes from old Near East forms of covenant-making and indicates commitment. It comes from the threefold betrothal by the Lord in Hosea 2:19-20, which can be taken as seven clauses.
Your fourth link adds nothing new other than the note that the crucifix represents the New Israel.
OP is too lame to warrant separate analysis.
TLDR: Semiotics can be exacting. The fact that satanists can and do use certain symbols with pagan intent does not corrupt the symbols automatically in every use or permit sweeping generalizations. If a group of sincere people use a symbol purely and a subgroup adds secret impure meaning to the symbol in an attempt to subvert the sincere, that fails as soon as the truth and honesty is brought to light. Infiltration is always a threat (tares), and it will be rooted out when it is mature so as not to harm the immature. Jesus warns of seven lying works of satan in Revelation 2-3 and we should be alert to all of them.
Well thanks GMAG! They said they wanted an elite research board so I signed up, but then I found I was repeating the same observations so often as to the same memes. There's not as much on GAW as there used to be. I guess I'll need to write a book someday.
Add: Best old answer for 666 that I've found is Teitan (Titan, including Emperor Titus) or Qaser Neron (Emperor Nero), runner-up Lateinos (Rome). I think there will be a new answer in time but there are too many oversimplified answers for it to get much traction at first.
Symbols are not corrupted if they are created purely and used purely. If it were possible for a minority to corrupt a word used by the majority by claiming it has a new offensive meaning, the minority would have undue power to modify language. The majority must simply maintain the purity of the original meaning and not abrogate it due to manipulative, invented claims.
God created cubes (e.g. plant cells) and they are not evil in themselves. God specifically ordered that Moses had the Holiest Place built as a cube shape.
The hexagram and hexagon first appear in 23rd-century BC Armenia as a generic geometric polygram device and are not evil in themselves.
The hexagram hexagon is not automatically a "cube of Saturn" because it has many other meanings.
You are correct that satanism is saturnism and titanism. However, related names like Titus (a Bible book) are not evil in themselves.
You are correct that Saturday is named after Saturn, as all days have been named after heavenly bodies in many languages. However, naming days of the week is not evil in itself, and using the English names is a subject on which different consciences rule differently. I generally, but not rigorously, use the 3-letter abbreviations for weekdays as a compromise.
Shabbath is not Saturday, it is the day from Fri sundown to Sat sundown, which is always distinguished. Shabbath is not evil in itself, and Charlie Kirk has recently championed the original Sabbath for Christians.
Since cubes are not evil in themselves, putting Scriptures in an ornamental cube to be worn is not evil in itself, and is a literalist reading of Moses, which is Christian Scripture. Jesus didn't say not to wear cubes, he specifically said not to make the cubes extra large, implying that he permitted the wearing of Scriptures if it wasn't for attention-getting purposes.
The cube of Mecca is based on earlier cubical Arabic shrines, which can be inferred to be copies of the cubes of Moses, Solomon, and Zerubbabel, so the shape as a sanctuary is not evil in itself.
The hexagram was never "the star of Remphan". I showed that the most likely original meaning of star of Remphan (Rephaim or Titans) was Nehushtan. Several symbols could be attested as being "a star of Remphan", such as the crucifix itself when misused, the rods of Aesclapius and Hermes, the dollar sign, the T-and-O symbol, the uroboros, some I forgot, and because of its recent association the hexagram (not by semiotic tradition but by reassignment).
Therefore satanism is only limited to knowing pagan use of a symbol that has known pagan connotations: it cannot be ascribed to unknowing use or unknown connotations.
Your first link is solely about, well, insignificant reflections on 67.
Your second link refreshes the above, while also adding the map of Saturn. The fact that a hexagonal field was recently discovered on Saturn, obviously created by God, does not mean that satan has any special rights in the hexagon.
Your third link illustrates cube and black-cube art as well as referring to rings of pilgrims in Mecca. I do not know the origins of the various sculptures so it is possible some of them are intended as satanic symbols. The tradition of encircling seven times comes from old Near East forms of covenant-making and indicates commitment. It comes from the threefold betrothal by the Lord in Hosea 2:19-20, which can be taken as seven clauses.
Your fourth link adds nothing new other than the note that the crucifix represents the New Israel.
OP is too lame to warrant separate analysis.
TLDR: Semiotics can be exacting. The fact that satanists can and do use certain symbols with pagan intent does not corrupt the symbols automatically in every use or permit sweeping generalizations. If a group of sincere people use a symbol purely and a subgroup adds secret impure meaning to the symbol in an attempt to subvert the sincere, that fails as soon as the truth and honesty is brought to light. Infiltration is always a threat (tares), and it will be rooted out when it is mature so as not to harm the immature. Jesus warns of seven lying works of satan in Revelation 2-3 and we should be alert to all of them.
I'm really starting to like the cut of your jib.
Well thanks GMAG! They said they wanted an elite research board so I signed up, but then I found I was repeating the same observations so often as to the same memes. There's not as much on GAW as there used to be. I guess I'll need to write a book someday.
Add: Best old answer for 666 that I've found is Teitan (Titan, including Emperor Titus) or Qaser Neron (Emperor Nero), runner-up Lateinos (Rome). I think there will be a new answer in time but there are too many oversimplified answers for it to get much traction at first.