The Gospel of John is a theological, not historical text or Gospel. When compared to the texts of Matthew, Mark, and Luke the Gospel of John portrays an entirely different order of key events from the other texts.
One example is the story of the cleansing of the temple in John 2:13-24. In the Gospel of John, it portrays this story as occurring at the beginning of Jesus' alleged ministry. This contradicts the setup of the story in the other texts that put it towards the end of Jesus' alleged ministry. Christians who don't see that this is talking about the same story do not have the reading comprehension to see this for what it is. When Christians approach this story with pre-conceived ideas that there aren't any contradictions in the Gospels and they all harmonize together, they commonly arrive at the conclusion there were two temple cleansings that took place. Pre-conceived bias distorts Christian's reading comprehension in such a case.
Are you incapable of answering those questions?
You're incapable of being sincere.
That's a fixable problem, btw.
What kind of Orthodox group do you belong to?
After talking to you and two other Orthodox Christians it's no wonder you're incapable of answering basic questions and engaging in a conversation. Your faith boils down to blindly believing what you're told and not questioning anything. You see asking basic questions as being some kind of affront against your God, and can't provide any kind of explanations.
Simply asking you to explain how the placement of the temple cleansing story of John doesn't contradict the placement of the same story in Matthew, Mark, or Luke is beyond your intellectual capacity to discuss.
Just your assumption.
You don't have ears to hear.
So you're saying that your explanation is to just read it again cuz I'll somehow think different and just like you after reading it again?
Do you understand that not everyone will arrive at the same conclusion when they read the same passage in something like the Bible?