Because most soldiers of the time were unwilling conscripts who didn't believe in the occupation the majority female electorate had installed.
It's why area bombing should have been the strategy over mass casualties on the battlefield. You'll kill more Nazi voters through razing cities than artillery striking conscripts.
The war should have been rammed down women's throats and female casualties should have been a target, not a consequence of bombings, forcing them to reap what their votes had sowed.
It's obvious that the electorate in 30s Germany was majority female, more than any other nation.
The reason it's not talked about more is because of what most people think should be done to Nazis, and what that fact implies should be done to women.
Even Churchill and the leaders of the Allies refused to entertain the idea of executing female regime allies and camp guards after the war for that reason.
Because most soldiers of the time were unwilling conscripts who didn't believe in the occupation the majority female electorate had installed.
It's why area bombing should have been the strategy over mass casualties on the battlefield. You'll kill more Nazi voters through razing cities than artillery striking conscripts.
The war should have been rammed down women's throats and female casualties should have been a target, not a consequence of bombings, forcing them to reap what their votes had sowed.
Ugh, just give it up already. Everyone knows it's not, nor has ever been muh womenz to blame as a cop out.
It's obvious that the electorate in 30s Germany was majority female, more than any other nation.
The reason it's not talked about more is because of what most people think should be done to Nazis, and what that fact implies should be done to women.
Even Churchill and the leaders of the Allies refused to entertain the idea of executing female regime allies and camp guards after the war for that reason.