Common law (in the original sense) was indeed the law of the land — not written by kings or parliaments, but recognized by custom, tradition, and moral consensus. • It was enforced by juries of peers — the 12-person jury system that protected citizens from unjust authority. • And yes, common law crimes like murder, theft, rape, and arson were punishable because they violated the shared peace and safety of society — even before governments codified them.
That system formed the backbone of both English and early American justice.
Which law is taught in law school and why? What law does the BAR exam test? What does BAR stand for? What is an Esquire?
May it please The Crown ....
A contradiction in terms aka plural (common) singular (law) aka mono-poly...a game.
Law implies L(and) A(ir) W(ater)..."law of the land" represents a rhetorical test for ones discernment, just like "sovereign citizen".
Re-cogni implies ones perception...cu-stom (together with another) contradicts that.
Few suggest sales to tempt many into custom consensus...buying into it sacrifices ones perception. A costumer only recognizes advertisements...not the selling out of self to another when trading ones choice for a chosen ones suggestion.
The only consensus within morality implies both sides consenting to be in conflict with one another. Morality implies consensus of mutual destruction.
Notice that murder during mob violence hardly gets justice because it's harder to find the singular among the common...
Why do you think few tempt many together into protests to train so called "swarm" surveillance? It's because of the power of the singular among the weakness of the common.