Was going through my old posts looking for something, saw this one. The account was sacked so video wasn't available. Looked for another one and uploaded it here.
This whole thing is so unbelievable. Why would they do this. People used to watch X-files.. but this spin-off, you wouldn't have too many people watching it. Seems to be what they call "Predictive Programming". What is the purpose of that. I think it has something to do with getting the idea out there in the collective consciousness. Let me look into this. Google gemini AI would probably be uptight about this stuff.. asking grok.
I ask: In conspiracy research you see about "Predictive Programming". What would the purpose of that be. Think it has something to do with getting the idea out there in the collective consciousness. What kind of effect would that have.
Grok says:
Predictive programming is a concept in conspiracy research suggesting that certain ideas, events, or scenarios are deliberately embedded in media—films, TV shows, books, or other cultural products—to prepare or condition the public’s subconscious for future events. The idea is that by exposing people to specific narratives or outcomes in a fictional context, those events become more familiar, acceptable, or less shocking when they occur in reality.Purpose of Predictive ProgrammingFrom a conspiracy perspective, the purposes often cited include:Desensitization: Familiarizing the public with extreme or controversial events (e.g., dystopian scenarios, technological control, or global crises) so they’re less likely to resist or question them when they happen.
Social Conditioning: Shaping public perception or behavior to align with a particular agenda, such as accepting surveillance, loss of freedoms, or new societal norms.
Psychological Priming: Planting ideas in the collective consciousness to make people more receptive to certain outcomes, reducing cognitive dissonance when those outcomes manifest.
Control of Narrative: Establishing a framework where real events are interpreted in ways that align with the goals of those allegedly orchestrating them, often attributed to powerful groups like governments, corporations, or secret societies.
Manifestation or Occult Influence: Some theories suggest it’s a way to “manifest” events by embedding them in the collective psyche, drawing on metaphysical or esoteric ideas about the power of belief and intention.
Effects on the Collective ConsciousnessThe concept hinges on the idea that the collective consciousness—a shared pool of beliefs, fears, and expectations—can be influenced by repeated exposure to specific ideas. Potential effects include:Normalization: Repeated exposure to scenarios (e.g., pandemics, authoritarian regimes, or advanced AI) in fiction can make them feel inevitable or less alarming, reducing public pushback.
Altered Perception: People may interpret real-world events through the lens of familiar media narratives, limiting critical thinking or alternative interpretations.
Behavioral Compliance: Subtle cues in media could encourage acceptance of policies or changes, like increased surveillance or loss of privacy, by framing them as necessary or heroic.
Amplification of Fear or Hope: Depending on the narrative, it could either instill fear (making people more controllable) or hope (guiding them toward a desired vision, like transhumanism).
Subconscious Seeding: Ideas planted in the subconscious may influence decision-making or societal trends without individuals consciously questioning them.
Psychological and Social MechanismsPriming Effect: Psychological research shows that exposure to certain stimuli can influence later thoughts or behaviors. For example, seeing dystopian themes in movies might make people more likely to accept similar real-world policies.
Availability Heuristic: Familiarity with a concept through media makes it seem more plausible or likely, even if it’s speculative or improbable.
Cultural Reinforcement: Media shapes cultural norms and expectations, creating a feedback loop where fictional narratives align with real-world developments.
Skeptical Perspective
Critics argue predictive programming is often just hindsight bias—people retroactively find connections between media and events because humans are pattern-seeking. Media creators might simply be drawing from current trends, fears, or logical extrapolations of technology and society, not orchestrating future events. Coincidences are inevitable given the volume of media produced.
Examples Often Cited
Movies like The Matrix or Contagion are said to have foreshadowed transhumanism or pandemics.
TV shows like The Simpsons are frequently referenced for seemingly predicting events, though this is often attributed to statistical likelihood given the show’s long run and broad scope.
Ultimately, the effect depends on how much you believe media can shape subconscious beliefs versus reflecting existing trends. There’s no definitive evidence proving predictive programming as a deliberate strategy, but the concept resonates with those skeptical of centralized power and media influence. If you want me to dig into specific examples or analyze related media, let me know!
It makes it easier for them to sell the lies. If you keep showing planes hitting the WTC, then the masses will have an easier time accepting that explanation than the very obvious "it was a planned demolition" reality.
Was going through my old posts looking for something, saw this one. The account was sacked so video wasn't available. Looked for another one and uploaded it here.
This whole thing is so unbelievable. Why would they do this. People used to watch X-files.. but this spin-off, you wouldn't have too many people watching it. Seems to be what they call "Predictive Programming". What is the purpose of that. I think it has something to do with getting the idea out there in the collective consciousness. Let me look into this. Google gemini AI would probably be uptight about this stuff.. asking grok.
I ask: In conspiracy research you see about "Predictive Programming". What would the purpose of that be. Think it has something to do with getting the idea out there in the collective consciousness. What kind of effect would that have.
Grok says:
Predictive programming is a concept in conspiracy research suggesting that certain ideas, events, or scenarios are deliberately embedded in media—films, TV shows, books, or other cultural products—to prepare or condition the public’s subconscious for future events. The idea is that by exposing people to specific narratives or outcomes in a fictional context, those events become more familiar, acceptable, or less shocking when they occur in reality.Purpose of Predictive ProgrammingFrom a conspiracy perspective, the purposes often cited include:Desensitization: Familiarizing the public with extreme or controversial events (e.g., dystopian scenarios, technological control, or global crises) so they’re less likely to resist or question them when they happen. Social Conditioning: Shaping public perception or behavior to align with a particular agenda, such as accepting surveillance, loss of freedoms, or new societal norms.
Psychological Priming: Planting ideas in the collective consciousness to make people more receptive to certain outcomes, reducing cognitive dissonance when those outcomes manifest.
Control of Narrative: Establishing a framework where real events are interpreted in ways that align with the goals of those allegedly orchestrating them, often attributed to powerful groups like governments, corporations, or secret societies.
Manifestation or Occult Influence: Some theories suggest it’s a way to “manifest” events by embedding them in the collective psyche, drawing on metaphysical or esoteric ideas about the power of belief and intention.
Effects on the Collective ConsciousnessThe concept hinges on the idea that the collective consciousness—a shared pool of beliefs, fears, and expectations—can be influenced by repeated exposure to specific ideas. Potential effects include:Normalization: Repeated exposure to scenarios (e.g., pandemics, authoritarian regimes, or advanced AI) in fiction can make them feel inevitable or less alarming, reducing public pushback.
Altered Perception: People may interpret real-world events through the lens of familiar media narratives, limiting critical thinking or alternative interpretations.
Behavioral Compliance: Subtle cues in media could encourage acceptance of policies or changes, like increased surveillance or loss of privacy, by framing them as necessary or heroic.
Amplification of Fear or Hope: Depending on the narrative, it could either instill fear (making people more controllable) or hope (guiding them toward a desired vision, like transhumanism).
Subconscious Seeding: Ideas planted in the subconscious may influence decision-making or societal trends without individuals consciously questioning them.
Psychological and Social MechanismsPriming Effect: Psychological research shows that exposure to certain stimuli can influence later thoughts or behaviors. For example, seeing dystopian themes in movies might make people more likely to accept similar real-world policies.
Availability Heuristic: Familiarity with a concept through media makes it seem more plausible or likely, even if it’s speculative or improbable.
Cultural Reinforcement: Media shapes cultural norms and expectations, creating a feedback loop where fictional narratives align with real-world developments.
Skeptical Perspective
Critics argue predictive programming is often just hindsight bias—people retroactively find connections between media and events because humans are pattern-seeking. Media creators might simply be drawing from current trends, fears, or logical extrapolations of technology and society, not orchestrating future events. Coincidences are inevitable given the volume of media produced.
Examples Often Cited
Movies like The Matrix or Contagion are said to have foreshadowed transhumanism or pandemics.
TV shows like The Simpsons are frequently referenced for seemingly predicting events, though this is often attributed to statistical likelihood given the show’s long run and broad scope.
Ultimately, the effect depends on how much you believe media can shape subconscious beliefs versus reflecting existing trends. There’s no definitive evidence proving predictive programming as a deliberate strategy, but the concept resonates with those skeptical of centralized power and media influence. If you want me to dig into specific examples or analyze related media, let me know!
It makes it easier for them to sell the lies. If you keep showing planes hitting the WTC, then the masses will have an easier time accepting that explanation than the very obvious "it was a planned demolition" reality.