He was warned repeatedly not to speak like a jogger with all of his "ayh" and "homey" Ebonics babble and his intolerable defense of marrying 12 year olds, lying and endless vote-manipulation accounts.
Pkvi's alts have history full of that degenerate filth.
The entire ConPro community is glad that he's finally gone.
I'm sorry this pkvi street-shitter washed up as a refugee on Conspiracies shore. Now he's your problem.
You can tell this "user" is a fraud by how "ayh" was generated based on restoring linguistics of ich (I) but then accuses me of ever having written "homey". Blech.
Not sure where the 12 year old claim comes from. Perhaps a Freudian slip of self.
But it is the "lying" part that speaks the most profoundly about the account and moderators now. Why would lying be a context when every thing shared were articles and other users post irrelevance like memes? You know who intrinsically labels things as "lies" when creating a restrictive narrative? How is the weather in Tel Aviv?
Setting aside that moderators have the ability to see user data which denies your claim -- how would voter manipulation work if my posts were often the lower scored and never "top"?
Yes the content bothers you -- but perhaps bcz it was too /on the nose/
But you did, bcz you are obsessed with attention -- other wise you could easily find the resistance to replying. But you can't. Bcz you equate to a negative value -- desperate to have any -- so you will respond.
When the power goes out -- the contradictory vacuousness of your life will confront you. Hilariously you will fall.
u/pkvi_stannum deserved to be banned from ConPro.
He was warned repeatedly not to speak like a jogger with all of his "ayh" and "homey" Ebonics babble and his intolerable defense of marrying 12 year olds, lying and endless vote-manipulation accounts.
Pkvi's alts have history full of that degenerate filth.
The entire ConPro community is glad that he's finally gone.
I'm sorry this pkvi street-shitter washed up as a refugee on Conspiracies shore. Now he's your problem.
You can tell this "user" is a fraud by how "ayh" was generated based on restoring linguistics of ich (I) but then accuses me of ever having written "homey". Blech.
Not sure where the 12 year old claim comes from. Perhaps a Freudian slip of self.
But it is the "lying" part that speaks the most profoundly about the account and moderators now. Why would lying be a context when every thing shared were articles and other users post irrelevance like memes? You know who intrinsically labels things as "lies" when creating a restrictive narrative? How is the weather in Tel Aviv?
Setting aside that moderators have the ability to see user data which denies your claim -- how would voter manipulation work if my posts were often the lower scored and never "top"?
Yes the content bothers you -- but perhaps bcz it was too /on the nose/
I didn't read a single word you wrote.
Because fuck you.
But you did, bcz you are obsessed with attention -- other wise you could easily find the resistance to replying. But you can't. Bcz you equate to a negative value -- desperate to have any -- so you will respond.
When the power goes out -- the contradictory vacuousness of your life will confront you. Hilariously you will fall.
cope and seethe faggot
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha