Name 100 people. See how well you do. The theatrical stories around the -ALL OF A SUDDEN- DOJ interviews with Maxwell and movement on Jeff is all too convenient to be plausible. If you remember -- we have seen this flip flop for two decades. This is performative to maintain the two party system. - Conspiracies

Name 100 people. See how well you do. The theatrical stories around the -ALL OF A SUDDEN- DOJ interviews with Maxwell and movement on Jeff is all too convenient to be plausible. If you remember -- we have seen this flip flop for two decades. This is performative to maintain the two party system. (media.scored.co)

posted 132 days ago by pkvi_stannum 132 days ago by pkvi_stannum +5 / -2

3 comments

3 comments share save hide report block hide replies

Comments (3)

sorted by:

▲ 0 ▼

– SilverGolfer 0 points 132 days ago +1 / -1

you can't name 100 people you know? wtf go get a hobby outside

permalink save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– pkvi_stannum [S] 0 points 131 days ago +1 / -1

What you lazily did is emotively respond without giving credibility to contrast. Did you try? No. Now add the element of being more specific on who you select to name in full -- name 100 people you know by full name who have committed a crime. See how long it takes you bcz supposedly it took only one afternoon for Maxwell. Try before you emote.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– SilverGolfer 0 points 131 days ago +1 / -1

"name 100 people"

"no not like that"

lol retard

permalink parent save report block reply