I read a local news story that yesterday a 56-year-old woman died 1 month after being bitten by a marmoset and the doctors said it was her fault for not continuing treatment and getting vaccinated.
If it is not a virus, what causes the neurological symptoms days or weeks (the supposed incubation time) after a bite?
You've read that whole book? It's dry. It's like a text book. But super resourceful.
Ya, in the authors also voice their frustration with the term Terrain Theory. It causes so many people to come to erroronius conclusion that not believing the virus theory therefore means you are automatically in some other theory called terrain. It's misleading and a clue to how they control multiple narratives, to keep the waters muddy.
Anyway, you're on the right path. First, test the theories being presented. And in the case of "what really makes you Ill". It goes into great lengths about what aspects about Illness, such as rabies, are unproven pseudoscience.
But you know how science actually works. Just because you disprove something doesn't mean you have a new theory. It's just that germ theory doesn't hold water. And that's the point of the book. That and reminding everyone that the science behind what is bad for us is actually pretty well established. We are just the idiots who think we caught a cold, when we've been eating fast food or smoking, being lethargic, living two lives or living a lie, stress...there are plenty of explainatations for why people get sick without needing to consider viruses
Oh, the book convinced me that germ theory doesn't hold water, it's just that not having definitive answers to explain the symptoms of rabies makes me uneasy about the deadly nature of the supposed disease and not being able to counter-argue with people who use this example to say that vaccines work.
It's covered pretty well from pages 168 to 171.
Rabbies is a myth going back to the lying sack of shit, Louis Pateur. It's so rare anyway, most doctors have never seen it. And the ones who have basically heard there was an animal bite and automatically it's rabies. Not like they have time to identify the virus, and they couldn't even if they tried because the fact the supposed virus has never been isolated and the process to match a virus to an isolated standard is also retarded because the world of virology says you only need to match like 15% of hypothetical virus.
Virology is lunacy. You don't sound well versed, I wouldn't try to convince people, they are hopeless even with the best person explaining because they are programmed to not listen and reason, rather to judge and believe in the person, their stature and authority, not the content.