Anti-vaxx Redditor debunks graphene disinfo
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
There were definitely lipid nano particles used to infiltrate cells. The most mainstream, seminal research admits this because mRNA requires it for both infiltration and replication. These LNPs are expensive, fragile and need to be temperature controlled. Why wouldn't they try to improve upon this as part of a normal R&D effort? The conspiracy comes in when they were using the cover of immunity to perform their own toxicity studies on a batch basis to determine how to use GO vs LNPs. Bonus points: bad batches tended to target political enemies.
It's not impossible that they used some bad batch experiments with exotic material. The issue at hand is whether Pablo Campra's Raman spectroscopy proved graphene was in the vials he looked at or not.
Lipid nano particles are fully admitted in the patents as part of this technology, yes. That's a separate issue.
Well so then my feedback would be that they have shown it could be GO but not that it is GO. Additional evidence comes from the dozens of peer reviewed articles admitting they're exploiting GO to replace or augment LNPs. For some this is enough, for a skeptic they'll require more proof. Even if they admitted they were doing it some people would still refuse to believe it or would begin downplaying the safety concern. Denial can be dogmatic
Actual proof is needed to make a strong claim. When you have multiple liars saying it is graphene, but no proper studies that can withstand peer review, why still believe it is in there?
Articles admitting GO is used in other experiential products doesn't prove it is in these shots. That's still speculation. I admit, they could be putting that stuff into some shots for experimentation, but I'm not going to tell people I know it is in there.