Five years ago, if you had been told you needed to watch what you said on social media and in public in the USA, no one would have believed it.
And she’s fucking retarded. Five years ago, every white person knew exactly what happened if you told the truth on the Internet. Fifteen years ago, we knew it.
Section 230 of the United States Code provides immunity to online platform services for content generated by their users.
No, it doesn’t. It does no such thing. That’s the exact opposite of what it does. It’s why they’ve been banning and censoring truth for decades.
The White House threatened removal of that protection
But there is no protection. There’s nothing to remove.
removal of Section 230 protection would potentially expose the platforms to financially crippling liability lawsuits.
No? Because they already delete and ban everything.
It could very well be that my words, typed into a private email exchange, were gathered by AI, and not some lurking agent. But either way, they were gathered. It would appear that these “Officials,” who generate “external reports,” still have “concerns.”
Maybe you should peacefully protest. That’ll solve it, right?
Section 230 prevents these platforms from being liable for the stupid things their users post. If they pull this, then they're liable and they go bankrupt.
lol yes she is
And she’s fucking retarded. Five years ago, every white person knew exactly what happened if you told the truth on the Internet. Fifteen years ago, we knew it.
No, it doesn’t. It does no such thing. That’s the exact opposite of what it does. It’s why they’ve been banning and censoring truth for decades.
But there is no protection. There’s nothing to remove.
No? Because they already delete and ban everything.
Maybe you should peacefully protest. That’ll solve it, right?
Section 230 prevents these platforms from being liable for the stupid things their users post. If they pull this, then they're liable and they go bankrupt.
how did it help Julian Assange ?