gravity is little a, in every equation. you can just replace acceration and done., no need for a gravity.
its not a force, its not provable, not viewable, and everything about objects moving up and down in the media, we call air, which is like very thin water, is explained by boyancy and electrostatics, the magnetic preference of objects to fall down to the ground. way above your pay grade still. you beleieve in grabity. got a long way to go to get out of this, but your first mistake is thinking you are teaching...you cant learn that way.
oh yeah, and i already names space as not having a shape. there is one. open space, doesnt have an end, so, it cannot be shape. like infinity land. that would also have no shape. but you beleive in space, because you have been told to beleive in space. not any other reason. and that means you cant imagine that space is not real. you cant image those little dots of light at night, are just little dots. because you have been told what they are.
last thing, you must watch too many flat earth psy op channels, I am not a flat earther, i dont know any. i just call out bad theory. and the heliocentric model, cant hold up to math or scientific method.
but do you realize how much rides on this decpetion? if the earth isnt a globe, what is the place? and ifs not a globe, then its not in space...then is the earth really billions of years old? that begs a new question, how did we get placed here, and who is outside of these walls.
all crazy talk to the brainwashed mind. good luck. try listening
Space is not empty. And if you believe what you've we've told, expanding for Infinity.
The shape is constantly changing.
What about the shape of radio waves or light photons as they expand form the source, always changing, undefined.
Now, your best argument against all the hundred of debunks against the globe is that everything must have a shape.
It's kinda weak, and doesn't address any evidence, plus, you forgot to address any point I made.
but I think I was at least able to place doubt on the rule that everything has a shape, and you can then stop assuming that every else I says be wrong because I said that land might never end.
This isn't exactly going anywhere, 😔, thanks for your concern but I'm not going back to being a brainwashed, institutionalized, space fan
Exactly, you couldn't. Your ego and bias preceded betray you.
You think I give a fuck about you? Think I care of people listening or reject me? It's 100% your loss. All you did was miss an opportunity to speak with someone who could have taught you something new.
You could have decided to throw it out, but resistance and making it impossible for discussion, debating everything I say even if you don't have a point...it's hard to explain how frustrating you behave.
Ask questions that are relevant and help you understand. You're wasting your time of you think you're able to teach me, I already know everything you do.
I allowed your red herring about shape, even though you ignored me and you see what happened? Totally railed. Whatever, what are the chances this conversation gets put back on track because you realize what I'm saying is true? Zero. It's a waste for both of us
Also, I still pointed out that space doesn't have a shape. That photons, magnetic fields, radio waves, all don't have a shape.
Air, water, fire, all don't have a shape. Definded by other factors.
The entire point of the conversation before this stupid " everything has a shape" red herring was that earth could be billions of miles of land. Stretching forever....just like you believe space is.
oh jeez, this is mess.
gravity is little a, in every equation. you can just replace acceration and done., no need for a gravity.
its not a force, its not provable, not viewable, and everything about objects moving up and down in the media, we call air, which is like very thin water, is explained by boyancy and electrostatics, the magnetic preference of objects to fall down to the ground. way above your pay grade still. you beleieve in grabity. got a long way to go to get out of this, but your first mistake is thinking you are teaching...you cant learn that way.
oh yeah, and i already names space as not having a shape. there is one. open space, doesnt have an end, so, it cannot be shape. like infinity land. that would also have no shape. but you beleive in space, because you have been told to beleive in space. not any other reason. and that means you cant imagine that space is not real. you cant image those little dots of light at night, are just little dots. because you have been told what they are.
last thing, you must watch too many flat earth psy op channels, I am not a flat earther, i dont know any. i just call out bad theory. and the heliocentric model, cant hold up to math or scientific method.
but do you realize how much rides on this decpetion? if the earth isnt a globe, what is the place? and ifs not a globe, then its not in space...then is the earth really billions of years old? that begs a new question, how did we get placed here, and who is outside of these walls.
all crazy talk to the brainwashed mind. good luck. try listening
by redefining "shape" to include empty space.
but even if i accepted your new definition (i don't), it doesn't apply to the earth since the earth is not empty space.
Space is not empty. And if you believe what you've we've told, expanding for Infinity.
The shape is constantly changing. What about the shape of radio waves or light photons as they expand form the source, always changing, undefined.
Now, your best argument against all the hundred of debunks against the globe is that everything must have a shape.
It's kinda weak, and doesn't address any evidence, plus, you forgot to address any point I made. but I think I was at least able to place doubt on the rule that everything has a shape, and you can then stop assuming that every else I says be wrong because I said that land might never end.
This isn't exactly going anywhere, 😔, thanks for your concern but I'm not going back to being a brainwashed, institutionalized, space fan
I will not waste my time debating geometry and physics with someone that can't define "shape".
That's just about as pointless as trying to debate gender and biology with someone who can't define "woman".
Exactly, you couldn't. Your ego and bias preceded betray you.
You think I give a fuck about you? Think I care of people listening or reject me? It's 100% your loss. All you did was miss an opportunity to speak with someone who could have taught you something new.
You could have decided to throw it out, but resistance and making it impossible for discussion, debating everything I say even if you don't have a point...it's hard to explain how frustrating you behave.
Ask questions that are relevant and help you understand. You're wasting your time of you think you're able to teach me, I already know everything you do.
I allowed your red herring about shape, even though you ignored me and you see what happened? Totally railed. Whatever, what are the chances this conversation gets put back on track because you realize what I'm saying is true? Zero. It's a waste for both of us
Also, I still pointed out that space doesn't have a shape. That photons, magnetic fields, radio waves, all don't have a shape.
Air, water, fire, all don't have a shape. Definded by other factors.
The entire point of the conversation before this stupid " everything has a shape" red herring was that earth could be billions of miles of land. Stretching forever....just like you believe space is.
Right?