It's well understood that not ALL open source is controlled. But IMO the bigger open source projects that get funding are all or mostly Jewish.
For example, meet Richard Stallman, a highly influential figure in the open source project of Linux. Who was he? Nothing but an ordinary Jewish pedophile who defended Jeffery Epstein and promoted pedophelia.
Richard Stallman was also the mentor of Bradley M. Kuhn who funded another "Open Source" game engine called Godot through a Brooklyn Jewish fund called Software Freedom Conservancy.
I mention how game engine Godot is also Jewish because from my earlier research on Robert Maxwell, I found out that they were trying to control the gaming industry early on with his son Kevin by trying to buy up games like Tetris.
In short, anything that is big is also controlled by them even if it's offered as a "free, freedom loving alternative".
luckily you have the option to fork it and maintain it with the help of people you trust... unlike closed source slop like crapple or microshart
But in reality, how many people actually have the energy and resources to dedicate themselves to a good fork?
In practical terms, money is what moves the big open source projects and those get hand picked with an agenda. We can pat ourselves on the back that we can fork them, but I am not sure how many actually do.
not many, but the option is there, and that's what truly matters. sure, Stallman is an autistic weirdo with questionable stances on some things, but the GPL freed us from a lot of bullshit, from license changes upon a new owner/maintainer to big tech fucking with the little guy over some code. let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater, because that's exactly what (((those))) attacking open source want, with us back at the plantation.