a) If one claims self as "me; myself or I/ayh"; then every other one is grouped into "you". Nature sets each one apart from one another...it's those within who tempt each other back together.
b) Want implies a division (want vs not want) which mantles ones discernment of need...ones self imposed cloak of willing ignorance.
c) Are chosen ONES a group or is there a singular implication hidden in plain sight?
anarchy
a) AN (without) ARKHOS (leader)....being implies within (life) lead (inception towards death).
b) If one resists the temptation to follow suggested leaders; then one would discern for self that one needs to resist being led by wanted temptations towards death.
a) If one claims self as "me; myself or I/ayh"; then every other one is grouped into "you". Nature sets each one apart from one another...it's those within who tempt each other back together.
b) Want implies a division (want vs not want) which mantles ones discernment of need...ones self imposed cloak of willing ignorance.
c) Are chosen ONES a group or is there a singular implication hidden in plain sight?
a) AN (without) ARKHOS (leader)....being implies within (life) lead (inception towards death).
b) If one resists the temptation to follow suggested leaders; then one would discern for self that one needs to resist being led by wanted temptations towards death.
I prefer SANSarchy
a) SANS - "without"...both an inversion of being within and a sleight of hand for being WITHin OUTside.
b) SONS/SANS of anarchy...notice the double negation of sans (without) and an (without).
c) SANSKRIT aka sans (without) krta (to make, form). Notice also that sanskrit is being derived from samskrtam aka SAM (together with).
d) Consider....SANS Institute (information security)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SANS_Institute