The curve creates a "mountain" relative to a straight line plane. That's what you're seeing blocking the bottom of CN Tower.
You have to try to understand that, it's a belief that you were taught. I was taught the same.
When I realised how dogmatic the things I "knew" about the earth and gravity and space, I began to consider the possibility that flat earth's were right.
And I took it seriously for like, 10 minutes, and I got my first A-ha moment. It took hours of research after that, as I had to completely reteach myself about what space is, what that means for evolution. I don't care about bible stuff, btw. Religions are psy ops, like a snowball thrown down a mountain, they started with mal intent, and now, these deceptions take lives of their own in the narrative.
But you can't see that point clearly unless you realise that most of the world is entirely fooled.
Good luck. Understand the basics and come back to me with questions. Ive already gotten out of the indoctrination you are pushing, so, you're wasting your time arguing with me. Science and math proves we can't be on sphere, that means none of the rest of the solor system is possible as everyone currently understands it.
This is bigger than your capacity to image at this stage in your knowledge. If you want to debate prep, you should be the one who confronts the globe theory and I'll defend it with exactly what you'd expect from a globie. I was one. A good one.
Dude. I just told you that object, like clouds, DO squish into the horizon, mathematic law. Please, stop bull shitting.
Then you pull out you long distance lense and you can see the clouds that disappeared past the horizon a moment ago when you only used your eyes.
But you are just repeating yourself, doubling down like youre certain that you are correct, because you're certain flat earth is mumbo jumbo, and ya, look at Google and flat earth, it's a fucking psy op against flat earth.
Look at fake flat earth websites like the flat earth society. Who the fuck makes a fake flat earth society website and why?
Fuck the websites, just use you observations. Learn to see clearly. You will need to do some research, in the right places, but to re not ready for guidance.
Don't waste your time debunking flat earth, try to under the how flat earther debunk the globe
Squishing to horizon is not the same as disappearing bottom up behind it.
"Then you pull out you long distance lense and you can see the clouds that disappeared past the horizon"
Refraction over the horizon. You are seeing the clouds higher than they are hence you can see them.
This is the opposite of what you must demonstrate ... the disappearence of clouds bottom up without using curvature.
On a flat earth those clouds would just become infinitesimally small.
The reason you think objects will disappear behind the horizon, bottom up, is because that is what you see in real life ... on our spherical globe. Since you think the earth is flat, that is what you assume would happen on a flat eaeth. Any experiment would then be evidence of your assumption.
But again, perspective doesn't cause objects to disappear bottom up, it only causes squishing.
The concept of perspective is easily and completely demonstratable on paper. There's no disappearence of anything.
Bro, logical fallacy. Because I think the earth is flat is why I can't be right. What the fuck, do you even hear yourself?
I explained it, and you are back to repeating, so we aren't gonna make it. You're not gonna reindoctrinate me. I've already proved the earth can't be a sphere. I have no idea how far land goes, maybe infinity., who knows.
You don't want to think, fine. Leave me out of the globe cult and the insanity. It's so obvious when you finally take it seriously and look into flat earth proofs for yourself
This is a dogmatic statement.
You have to try to understand that, it's a belief that you were taught. I was taught the same.
When I realised how dogmatic the things I "knew" about the earth and gravity and space, I began to consider the possibility that flat earth's were right.
And I took it seriously for like, 10 minutes, and I got my first A-ha moment. It took hours of research after that, as I had to completely reteach myself about what space is, what that means for evolution. I don't care about bible stuff, btw. Religions are psy ops, like a snowball thrown down a mountain, they started with mal intent, and now, these deceptions take lives of their own in the narrative.
But you can't see that point clearly unless you realise that most of the world is entirely fooled.
Good luck. Understand the basics and come back to me with questions. Ive already gotten out of the indoctrination you are pushing, so, you're wasting your time arguing with me. Science and math proves we can't be on sphere, that means none of the rest of the solor system is possible as everyone currently understands it.
This is bigger than your capacity to image at this stage in your knowledge. If you want to debate prep, you should be the one who confronts the globe theory and I'll defend it with exactly what you'd expect from a globie. I was one. A good one.
It's not belief. It's observation.
Perspective doesn't cause dipping below horizon.
If you get far enough away, things get squished into the horizon, which make them hard to see, but they don't disappear below.
This flat earth stuff is just rhetorical mumbo jumbo.
Dude. I just told you that object, like clouds, DO squish into the horizon, mathematic law. Please, stop bull shitting.
Then you pull out you long distance lense and you can see the clouds that disappeared past the horizon a moment ago when you only used your eyes.
But you are just repeating yourself, doubling down like youre certain that you are correct, because you're certain flat earth is mumbo jumbo, and ya, look at Google and flat earth, it's a fucking psy op against flat earth.
Look at fake flat earth websites like the flat earth society. Who the fuck makes a fake flat earth society website and why?
Fuck the websites, just use you observations. Learn to see clearly. You will need to do some research, in the right places, but to re not ready for guidance.
Don't waste your time debunking flat earth, try to under the how flat earther debunk the globe
Squishing to horizon is not the same as disappearing bottom up behind it.
"Then you pull out you long distance lense and you can see the clouds that disappeared past the horizon"
Refraction over the horizon. You are seeing the clouds higher than they are hence you can see them.
This is the opposite of what you must demonstrate ... the disappearence of clouds bottom up without using curvature.
On a flat earth those clouds would just become infinitesimally small.
The reason you think objects will disappear behind the horizon, bottom up, is because that is what you see in real life ... on our spherical globe. Since you think the earth is flat, that is what you assume would happen on a flat eaeth. Any experiment would then be evidence of your assumption.
But again, perspective doesn't cause objects to disappear bottom up, it only causes squishing.
The concept of perspective is easily and completely demonstratable on paper. There's no disappearence of anything.
Bro, logical fallacy. Because I think the earth is flat is why I can't be right. What the fuck, do you even hear yourself?
I explained it, and you are back to repeating, so we aren't gonna make it. You're not gonna reindoctrinate me. I've already proved the earth can't be a sphere. I have no idea how far land goes, maybe infinity., who knows.
You don't want to think, fine. Leave me out of the globe cult and the insanity. It's so obvious when you finally take it seriously and look into flat earth proofs for yourself