AI is nothing more than machine learning. A day or so ago I recall seeing someone post a story stating Google was paying for rights to data mine a social media site for AI training purposes but I forgot the name of the platform. If AI has limited input via censorship, it will limit the available viewpoints. I had heard on the radio several days before that post that AI will likely be making local government and some corporate decisions in the not too distant future. What better way to deflect bad decisions than blame it on AI. They obviously don't want AI to learn any alternative views because it would muddy the waters and make it less predictable. How are we able to get information into the training data without being censored? Just my thoughts and something to consider
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
I truly believe AI could make good decisions if it gets trained thoroughly. It should be much the same as a child, if that child only hears and sees racist views they are likely to be racist until new information is acquired. In theory, AI should have an "open mind" and that should be a good thing over time. AI is already being used in farming for herbicide application with a camera identifying weeds and spraying only the weeds rather than crop dusting and entire field unnecessarily. AI has great potential to help increase productivity and reduce environmental damage