You can actually read english texts from 50-70 years ago and it seems like a superior language. The synatax makes way more sense and is overall way more coherent.
a) Consenting to any suggested language implies submission of self (inferior) to another (superior). Others suggest superiority to tempt ones consent to submit; and the more one who consents becomes inferior; the less superiority others will suggest.
b) Perceivable sound (superior need) or suggested words (inferior want) are based on ones choice.
c) Superior (inception towards death) generates inferior (life); which only then allows inferior to grow self.
syntax
Aka SYN (together) TAXIS (arrange)...a suggested inversion of whole (perceivable) setting itself apart (perception). Opposite of syntax (inception towards death) implies disorder (life).
Again...being implies ONE apart from ONE another. Not together. SYN/SIN aka a temptation to resist.
You can actually read english texts from 50-70 years ago and it seems like a superior language. The synatax makes way more sense and is overall way more coherent.
a) Consenting to any suggested language implies submission of self (inferior) to another (superior). Others suggest superiority to tempt ones consent to submit; and the more one who consents becomes inferior; the less superiority others will suggest.
b) Perceivable sound (superior need) or suggested words (inferior want) are based on ones choice.
c) Superior (inception towards death) generates inferior (life); which only then allows inferior to grow self.
Aka SYN (together) TAXIS (arrange)...a suggested inversion of whole (perceivable) setting itself apart (perception). Opposite of syntax (inception towards death) implies disorder (life).
Again...being implies ONE apart from ONE another. Not together. SYN/SIN aka a temptation to resist.