The "Jellyfish"
(cdn.videy.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
It cut off.. I'm a video editor my profession a d that last 30 seconds isn't enough ti determine anything... for interlaced video there are 2 fields per 32 frames a second.. the lines are resolution, and when an object moves say verticle then the fields can't scan and leave a streak crossing different horizontal lines.. it would makes sense however if the object stayed on the same path along a horizontal line.. these objects are moving all all sorts of paths.. they can't all be moths or insects..
For example try you own camera phone set to 30 frames in a low resolution and toss a stick with leaves into the field of view.. there is no known phenomenon of objects leaving tails like that unless the shutter speed is very very low, amd the image would be blurry.. weird tho right
Most of the rods are explainable by the fields theory (air screws), but not the ones by the people base jumping in Brazil, those are some weird rods, they are lines with 4 balls on the ends of the rod. Idk how fields would make that video, but you have to admit that it is on a VHS as many of these rod videos are. All of them come from VHS era which is why its probably fields..
But that Brazil one was kinda haunting me as I walked my dog last night not gonna lie.
Well the vhs or 640x480 resolution is what that is basically.. We're at 3900x2900 now or whatever.. but, the scans are still the same.. there are 30 frames per second amd 2 interlaced fields that make on 1 frame of video.. these rod things or flying things cannot leave streaks moving vertical over different scan lines or resolution lines.. it's impossible.. ever heard of video jello? Same principle.. if you move the camera left to right ,back and forth you'll get jello, but never ever a clean image.. I'm just ready to bet my house that these ain't no moths or bugs..
1 thing... at night the scan lines might produce a dragged blurred image. That is absolutely true.. the fps will be at its slowers to allow light to hit the sensor.. but at daytime???????? No freaking way.. I'd bet my 40 year career of editing film n video...
Here's a sample I shot a week ago..
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/dltsqiec2rhux529qzihn/ATP-Grill-Faster-encode-24.mp4?rlkey=4kob2h9rkvv5m9ddrgxfdp210&dl=0