It wil never not be called AI. Even AGI has been abandoned because that's been diluted as a definition.
Sam Altman this week said AGI will be achieved "relatively soon". [0]
Are we really expecting machine that updates itself as it operates learns. No, OpenAI defines AGI as "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work".
a few years ago it was "Machine Learning" before that "Smart" before that "i/eSomething", before that "Computerised", before that "Transistorised", before that "Electric" ... etc.
It's just an argument of nuance that is lost.
It wil never not be called AI. Even AGI has been abandoned because that's been diluted as a definition.
Sam Altman this week said AGI will be achieved "relatively soon". [0]
Are we really expecting machine that updates itself as it operates learns. No, OpenAI defines AGI as "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work".
Well, 2 years and we can all just stay in bed.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38978418
I don't mind you maintaining your position, it's more interesting that way.
And I agree about the erosion of definitions being something to resist.
What is do disagree with, in this instance, is that there is any kind of pre-planning involved. It's the laziness and ignorance of journalism.
AI is the buzzword
e.g. AI Pillow
a few years ago it was "Machine Learning" before that "Smart" before that "i/eSomething", before that "Computerised", before that "Transistorised", before that "Electric" ... etc.
you have to be resilient to their tactics