No, you can implied that it would be better if some such power(unspecified but implicit) was able to direct and control the people who are 'too dumb' (the too part is what it implies an objective or superior judgement) with voting rights to 'exercise them properly' (suggesting the higher power should be exercising them for them, ie. They would not be deciding anything)

...

I think my reading comprehension is fine. I implied you are too dumb because you appear to not notice your own implicit biases and would there fore best be left to the control of this implied power of yours to control. I am saying it cynically because I am not of those implicit beliefs. I do not think that some higher power can direct the masses because the purpose of the masses is to both fail and succeed such that there are always gains during the success and that the failures are not too critical as to wipe out the entire population, but they are designed to test out both good and bad ideas (because it is only upon the judgement of hindsight that we can ascribe good or bad) and so they are merely test cases each participating in the mass experiment