Partially , but same problem : multiple of rewrites (based on textual analysis), not very old, highly symbolic wanker nonsense , most translators of them are hopeless mumbo-jumbo believers already brainwashed into one certain POV (Hurtak is one example), and the most important thing: older texts with more clarity and less of the ambiguous nonsense exist (mostly Sumerian tablets ).
But yeah, it's still a big puzzle.and we only have fragmented pieces from all over the place and from many different millennia.
I'll use whatever I can, but the more symbolically interpreted stuff that can be translated five million different ways and can be made to "say" anything is not very helpful to putting the puzzle together.
Remote viewers do this. I give them more credit than channelers, which are just basically easily fooled takeover targets. But once one starts messing with time in RV, and farther ahead one jumps the more skewed the data is.
Partially , but same problem : multiple of rewrites (based on textual analysis), not very old, highly symbolic wanker nonsense , most translators of them are hopeless mumbo-jumbo believers already brainwashed into one certain POV (Hurtak is one example), and the most important thing: older texts with more clarity and less of the ambiguous nonsense exist (mostly Sumerian tablets ).
But yeah, it's still a big puzzle.and we only have fragmented pieces from all over the place and from many different millennia.
I'll use whatever I can, but the more symbolically interpreted stuff that can be translated five million different ways and can be made to "say" anything is not very helpful to putting the puzzle together.
Remote viewers do this. I give them more credit than channelers, which are just basically easily fooled takeover targets. But once one starts messing with time in RV, and farther ahead one jumps the more skewed the data is.