The mistake most made by members of this community are the use of the words: always, all, every
Secondly, a lack of qualifiers in such expansive statements, because life is messy and there are often exceptions, even if, as the saying goes, "exceptions prove the rule."
Example 1: All swans are white. Response: If I can fine but one black swan, then your assertion, really a hypothesis, has been nullified, or is wrong. Say, your average swan is white.
Example 2: All elections are rigged.
Response: This means that you are saying every election is rigged. Do you really think that the non-partisan off year election for your local community college or library board is rigged? Maybe, but that's fucking moronic. Rather, you should say "all important elections are rigged".
Example 3: All Jews are evil.
Response: All Jews today, or all Jews throughout all of time? Joseph and Mary weren't evil, therefore, your assertion is wrong. Rather, say "modern Judaism is evil as practiced."
We'll go over the ecological fallacy next, which the the second biggest logic mistake made.
These aren't logic mistakes.
Also, I understand the use of such adverbs, in those circumstances, to be hyperbolic rhetoric, more so, than precise declarations of proportion, etc.
For example "everybody loves John", is most likely a form of rhetoric, designed to indicate that John was generally liked, rather than a declaration that everybody, all people, literally love John.
Hyperbole has inflationary effects on adjectives and language in general. For example, if you walked into a room and started to give a speech about John and started with, "people generally liked John", in 1850 that might have worked just fine. But, in 2023, because of the language conflagration that is the Internet, it's more likely that you would start such a Speech with "literally everyone loved John".
I'm willing to admit when someone says "the ice cream was piled a mile high" or "he was the shit" that they are using colloquial language.
But that's not what's happening when people here are making formal arguments, specifically such as "all elections are rigged" and "all Jews are evil". Moreover, many of them, when you mention that "not all women are sluts" they will tend to defend their argument, rather than walking it back a half a step and say "lots of women are sluts, particularly those without a strong father figure."
I will concede that; I've also seen people defending such ridiculousness.