The US Government is LEGALLY Running the Largest Child Trafficking Organization in History of the World!
The states are taking children & giving them to somebody else, for money they get from the federal government.
All 50 states are involved in government subsidized child trafficking. It’s the largest and most pervasive child trafficking ring in the history of the world.
Children are seized from their families, due to the federal aid of the Adoptions and Safe Families Act.
The law Bill Clinton put in place to steal money from the Social Security Fund & Gave to the states to incentivize them to kidnap children. [link to www.congress.gov (secure)]
To receive the adoption incentives, or bonuses, local CPS must have more children. They must have more merchandise to sell.
Every child is worth approximately $1 Million Dollars to the State. This is a $60-$80 Billion dollar a year industry.
Parents are victimized by the system makes a profit for holding children longer & bonuses for not returning children to their parents.
Child Protective Services own statistics state that 83% of children taken by (CPS) are for unsubstantiated allegations, meaning, never should have happened in the first place.
Title IV-b 🔗 Title IV-e 🔗 2019 Child Maltreatment 🔗
Only issue I have with this is assuming "unfounded" = "innocent."
I wish it were that easy. I work in social services (mostly with special needs adults, though I did do a six month stint in a juvenile-corrections environment) and have been involved in a number of investigations, including a couple that I initiated.
Saw a guy (staff) take a juvenile off camera and beat the shit out of him. I reported this incident, and was interviewed for it, but every other person was apparently looking the other way and wouldn't throw him under the bus, so it was unfounded.
In another case, staff was off drinking in her car while an older individual with pretty severe disabilities laid in a puddle of her own urine for several hours. The other idiot on duty with her lied to cover her and that investigation also concluded as 'unfounded.'
Thankfully, in the second case I was in management and both employees have long since been terminated.
Not saying your overall point isn't correct. I believe it is. But my experience with investigations is that anything based purely on witness testimony will come back unfounded.