That’s because Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed, like literally the other 90% of Japan. Months of firebombing raids on Japan, but they dropped the nukes on two insignificant cities. Lol k bro. The cities were made of wood, all the buildings more or less. In the aftermath photos structural steel and concrete remained undamaged while everything else was gone.
Bombs like those, and newer, more efficient types, aren't to bad, after mere years. "Dirty bombs," and depleted uranium munitions, are potentially pretty bad, though, and hard to clean up after. The old nuclear winter propaganda was bogus, for sure.
Depends on yield, cleanup , isotopes used and how many generations of retards , cripples and maimed you are willing to risk. Hiroshimans had nowhere to go, so they survived..also, radioactivity effects on populations are severely stratified: some people show remarkable resilience against radiation damage, while others die fast from radiation .
Been to Hiroshima , been to Pripyat. Have my own calibrated alpha/beta/gamma detector.
Remember , part of the profitability of war is the material destruction itself and the ensuing debt financed expensive rebuilding that enables more money creation.
Yes, modern hydrogen bombs are different and were designed to be so, but immediate blast radius damage from them too esp. In megatons range is devastating to buildings as well.
That’s because Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed, like literally the other 90% of Japan. Months of firebombing raids on Japan, but they dropped the nukes on two insignificant cities. Lol k bro. The cities were made of wood, all the buildings more or less. In the aftermath photos structural steel and concrete remained undamaged while everything else was gone.
I follow what the picture is putting down, the only problem with the theory is that nuclear bombs are not real.
Bombs like those, and newer, more efficient types, aren't to bad, after mere years. "Dirty bombs," and depleted uranium munitions, are potentially pretty bad, though, and hard to clean up after. The old nuclear winter propaganda was bogus, for sure.
Depends on yield, cleanup , isotopes used and how many generations of retards , cripples and maimed you are willing to risk. Hiroshimans had nowhere to go, so they survived..also, radioactivity effects on populations are severely stratified: some people show remarkable resilience against radiation damage, while others die fast from radiation .
Been to Hiroshima , been to Pripyat. Have my own calibrated alpha/beta/gamma detector.
Remember , part of the profitability of war is the material destruction itself and the ensuing debt financed expensive rebuilding that enables more money creation.
Yes, modern hydrogen bombs are different and were designed to be so, but immediate blast radius damage from them too esp. In megatons range is devastating to buildings as well.