Short intro: This is just an idea to combine our knowledge to figure out what is going on. REALLY.
Template: My theory is that Big Pharma is created to put poison in people. They are promoting drugs that kill you slowly, while the media protects their image. The covid 19 scheme is created to push vaccines, and they prepared for that with all other hoaxes: mad cow, bird flu, ebola, etc. The current vaccines contain dangerous particles that aim to kill us.
The idea here is to put forth your research conclusion.
Here are the rules:
-
Everything you say must be backed up by actual researched information. That doesn't mean that you have to always display your sources. But if you are asked to show your sources, you must provide a quote that defends your statement and provide the source of it.
-
You can debate anyone on anything. You can challenge their statement with yours, considering you adhere to the first rule. Meaning, you can question anyone about anything, but you must also provide your quote and source, if asked about them.
-
Answers to any debate between two people CAN be provided by a third person, if they understand that the 1st and 2nd rule also applies to them and their statement.
-
If the communication chain breaks at some point, because someone doesn't reply. The one that put forth a challenge last is considered the winner of the debate. This can still be overruled by point 3, if anyone can answer the challenge.
Now, based on that information, here's what my template would look like in my head before I send it.
Template (my thoughts): My theory is that Big Pharma is created to put poison in people [History of big pharma. Etymology.]. They are promoting drugs that kill you slowly, while the media protects their image [Examples include the HIV drugs, cancer drugs, mercury drugs, etc.]. The covid 19 scheme is created to push vaccines, and they prepared for that with all other hoaxes: mad cow, bird flu, ebola, etc. [Examples of media news that only pushed for more vaccines]. The current vaccines contain dangerous particles that aim to kill us [Examples of Bell's Palsy, neurological damages, blood cloths, etc.].
These are my thoughts on the researched information that I have when writing these. If I put it in [], then I have the sources to prove my point. To prove it, anyone can ask me about anything in my statement, and it is my job to provide the sources.
This is not needed when typing your reply. It's only a template of my thoughts when writing these. Basically, why my sources prove the point that I am trying to make.
I welcome you to input any ideas on this or to share more information on the topic of Big Pharma, or create your own Discussion Chain, so we can finally figure out what is going on with everything.
I would like to have discussions that lead to some ending. Let's put our heads together and figure this thing out!
The end game of this is to have a conclusion on many topics that bother us. I see a lot of posts and I can group them in the theoretical sections like - finance, hollywood, religion, media, politics, occultism, history, etc. We can all share our thoughts, so we can find the final answer. But that only matters if we really dig deep into the topics and not dismiss the original post.
The way I see it. Whoever gives or asks for information will be rewarded. Whoever denies information and avoids it - should be proved wrong.
Let's put our heads together and figure out where this NWO path ends!
In my experience, Flat Earth is the ending argument, not the starting statement.
Have you heard people ask you "Why would they do that"? They seek a motive.
Can you compile their motive to lie to everyone about the very ground they stand on? Because schools have been doing that for decades. It just helps if you are prepared for this.
Another point - do you always get those naysayers that cannot research a simple thing, but are ready to insult you so they bring out the worst from you?
In my experience, you should reply only to those who seek answers, not to those who simply disagree. It has helped me and I hope this helps you. You don't know how many are bots or shills... You don't know who is worthy to know and who is there to only insult you with cheap uneducated insults... The question is - would you still do it? And the answer is - you must do it for the right people.
Bottom line, I know about flat Earth. But I know as much as you that people take it as the easiest thing that makes them smarter because they overcompensate their lacks from school... Flat-Earther is now an insult... They don't know that their grandparents were thought flat-Earth, because they never cared about their grandparents...
My point is that:
If you rush with flat-Earth theory, people will use it to make petty insults. If you buy your time and prepare better, people are more willing to listen.
I hope that was useful for you. I hope we can continue this conversation, so we can get to the end. I have to remind you that if you don't return a reply, you are assumed as the loser. I hope you return a reply! I really do.