Venture capital, how do they manage to keep the scams going?
Are these venture funds really profitable? I hardly doubt it. I know of many who really do not have any sound business models yet they keep the scam going, with rounds of investments.
From what I was able to put together at the moment:
-Venture capitalism is about directing innovation into the direction Jewish Israelis desire. (if you do what they like to do, such as surveillance, vaccines etc.. you get the money, but if you want clean energy, cancer cure, etc.. you won't get the money)
-Control monopolies, with venture capitalism they make sure whatever new market dominating businesses are all under their control.
-Circular investments and directing the money to their other investments and companies. A lot of these entrepreneurs/start ups end up doing "rapid growth" which means giving a lot of money to Google/Meta/etc.. to put up advertisements.
But still, seeing all these failed business, or what should be a failed business like Uber/Tesla etc.. still going and seeing those major investment funds like Sequoia Capital making profits does not add up.
How do they fidget the numbers, who pays the tap eventually for all of these scams or maybe I am missing something. Anyone with any info? Thx.
A key part to understanding how things work is the way that front-men are used to hide the real ownership of companies from the public. A front-man will own a company "on the books", but in reality he, and his entire fortune, belongs to the (((owners))). When he dies, or otherwise displeases the (((owners))), his fortune will disappear back to the (((owners))). Front-men and their companies can be found world wide in every industry.
At the top level the banks just create money from nothing. So in reality the way the economy works is much more a Master-slave relationship than how it is portrayed as a "free market". (((They))) are picking winners and losers.
Good point, I guess the best examples would be Google and Facebook. One would be beyond naive to think they are just "entrepreneurs".
I suppose this also applies to movie stars and celebrities. They give a nice image of a so called free society where people rise up from the ranks due to perceived talent.