Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

14
() See Comments
posted 2 years ago by Boomer_Supreme 2 years ago by Boomer_Supreme +17 / -3
24 comments share
24 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Make belief. Nobody took 4 shots. No majority. Give a figure of all those people who took all those shots on this planet. Lessening reduction after each shot. Nobody did. Perhaps some did. Not enough to cause significant population reduction. Even if all the vaxxed died. It wouldn't significantly impact the planet population. You're still assuming a majority vaxxed, Hahaha. The West. What figure is that? Not enough to cause that population decline you're citing.

Add up the Western population where the vax was a thing, what figure vaxxed, 60%. Think that was the curb of it lifting lock downs, 70% vaxxing. Remember this figure quoted where if so people vax then it's immunity. The disease becomes eradicated and it cannot..... Wait what? What. Bullshit. Let's be really generous and suggest 80% vaxxed with one or two shots.

3 shots is now at what figure of those 80%, 20-40%. Only 5-10% took 4 shots.

How is anybody being affected significantly by vaxx depopulation?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Harmony19192 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The depopulation endgame is weird because it's like, what do they hope to accomplish with how random the targets can be. It just seems weird, since why would you want to risk getting rid of voters or people who are needed to partake in duties that require a lot of training.

Granted I don't deny the concept of depopulation, I just could never figure out why it would be done in such a way that seems to be designed to throw the world into chaos, because say we do get a death spiral in vain of the Bubonic Plague. The recover of such a high volume of death would be very hard to handle as we'd as a society would have to restructure our very foundation to fill in the holes of the important people lost that did important task.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy