Now, why would Best Buy openly discriminate against white people?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I didn't get that.
OK, Vanguard with BlackRick owns 16.22%. Far from 51% to have a total control over business decisions. As far as I understand, they hardly will even have any significant voice in that business with their miserable stake. All they could do is to sell their stakes and temporarily slightly lower the price of company stocks. But this will not interfere with business itself, and its profits, only create some short-lasting discomfort among owners.
Who owns the rest 83.78%? Who owns control stake? Who have majority over board of directors (or whatever top business authority in company)? Aren't top managers had specific education or belongs to specific group? Aren't entities that graduate MBAs today have some interesting mandatory course or whatever? Could MBA degree be retracted after graduating if somebody does not follow some rules, like attorney or MD degree could be retracted if a lawyer or a doctor will say or do something against narrative or consensus?
Looks like there is something else, much worse than simple proxy with small stakes everywhere, and that Vanguard/BlackRock boogiemen are just a distraction.
Also interesting that it become very common to say that BlackRock/Vanguard owns 90% of businesses, like they fully own and control them or at least have control stake. But that is not true, yes, they have stakes in 90% of businesses, but that stakes are toщ small to control that businesses. If you have 5-10% here and there you do not have control, you just have a little profit from multiple places.
I think there is something very fishy with that strange narrative about proxy funds that have insignificant stakes everywhere. They could be not only proxy for somebody money, but also proxy for narratives and distraction.
Your degree isn’t retracted. Your license to practice can be taken away. It’s different.
Yes, different, but result is the same - you can't monetize your degree, or at least left with much worse opportunities.
So, what about MBA? Could it be retracted or could holder be somehow restricted in practice on misbehaviour determined by third party?
Nope. It’s just a degree. Your MBA isn’t that important in the business world. What’s more important is the people you know, which is why it’s so important to go to the right program and be a part of the right societies when pursuing business, especially as someone who doesn’t come from an established family. Any rules regarding where you’re allowed to work are usually only related to non-compete clauses in a work contract. Occasionally you can be barred from participating in certain industries as a result of legal action but that’s rare and there are usually loopholes you can work around.
OK, got it.
So, it is more like self-reproducing circle. You have to get a connection with some top manager to become top manager connection with whom will be necessary to become top manager and so on...
So, only 2. could be used for manipulation. If personal contacts in right circles is most important, then it is the lever that could be used.
As far as I understand, if you in a good relation with that right circle, then, even you failed some business, you will always find a new job. If you are thrown out or disliked by that circle, you have a little opportunities even if you was a perfect CEO.
Is NACD a forefront of that "right circle" for top managers in USA, or it is some unimportant organisation?