Their results are kinda in line with what you would expect from the globe earth model. At least this one is actually using some scientific data. Ive noticed one key flaw here.
They keep showing illustrations of the same thing, pg 42 for example.
It keeps showing this "hidden" area, but im guessing they must have seen the laser. Isnt this the entire point of refraction? This is how we are able to see sunsets before they actually occur. Which is something I still have yet to see a believable animation of with flat earth.
Even the opening slide about refraction seems wrong.
Laser light travels in a straight line through a homogeneous medium. Light angles due to different refraction indexes in a non-homogeneous atmosphere. We calculated the direction and amount of refraction to show how much laser-beam
deviation affects the measurement outcome. In a non-homogeneous atmosphere where the index of refraction increases with height, rays of sufficiently small initial elevation angles are refracted upward. This curvature is proportional to the rate of increase of the bi-directional index of refraction with height.
Even in a vacuum, free of any particulates, laser light does not travel in a straight line.
Light does not travel in a straight path. It travels as a wave. However as the wavelength is very small, it looks like it travels in a straight line. Also when light travels from one medium to another, it bends. It is called refraction.
We should know this from our discussions on the light is waves topic.
Seems like all that math was just a way to scare off normies from actually digging into their experiment lol.
What I would really like to see is some kind of marker in the middle, hard to do that with water im guessing, why this experiment would be easier on land.
Sucks that these globes arent using the real science. White guy is using his camera and has no clue what the scientific globes claim and the software engineer shouldnt even be there. Learned something about electo static thanks for sharing.
Now imagine these people using all their time, talent, and energy to do something that matters.
Like running for city council or even learning the science required to ultimately figure it out for themselves.
All we need is one nikolai tesla level genius and we could be going to outer space.
Chemical rockets are not the way.
So im wasting my time watching this, could be working more on my rigidbody controller.
http://walter.bislins.ch/blog/media/FECORE-experiment-description-Final-version.pdf
Their results are kinda in line with what you would expect from the globe earth model. At least this one is actually using some scientific data. Ive noticed one key flaw here.
They keep showing illustrations of the same thing, pg 42 for example.
It keeps showing this "hidden" area, but im guessing they must have seen the laser. Isnt this the entire point of refraction? This is how we are able to see sunsets before they actually occur. Which is something I still have yet to see a believable animation of with flat earth.
Even the opening slide about refraction seems wrong.
Even in a vacuum, free of any particulates, laser light does not travel in a straight line.
We should know this from our discussions on the light is waves topic.
Seems like all that math was just a way to scare off normies from actually digging into their experiment lol.
What I would really like to see is some kind of marker in the middle, hard to do that with water im guessing, why this experiment would be easier on land.
Sucks that these globes arent using the real science. White guy is using his camera and has no clue what the scientific globes claim and the software engineer shouldnt even be there. Learned something about electo static thanks for sharing.