Glowies love him because he's a glowie. His short form posts are bad faith arguments trying to astroturf FA onto this community, and is long form posts reek of AI generation.
All that said, I would not be surprised if NASA was a primarily an information laundering front at this point.
So you admit that this shitty website is a front for flat earthers under the guise of wanting to "Audit NASA"? Why not come clean and be honest about it?
Also, it may be deeper than a mere scam. It looks like an organized attempt to damage faith in our space program. Now who would try to do that? I'd like the chicken fuk-yu and some steamed rice and a couple of spring rolls, waiter.
Sounds good. Hope they are not flatties.
Glowies love him because he's a glowie. His short form posts are bad faith arguments trying to astroturf FA onto this community, and is long form posts reek of AI generation.
All that said, I would not be surprised if NASA was a primarily an information laundering front at this point.
Spoiler: they are.
Obviously, Flat Earthers who are really bad at hiding their real intentions.
The guy behind it is probably this one:
https://www.facebook.com/WitsitGetsIt/
https://www.youtube.com/@WitsitGetsIt
So you admit that this shitty website is a front for flat earthers under the guise of wanting to "Audit NASA"? Why not come clean and be honest about it?
https://auditnasa.com/
Are you flat earthers?
Ah, it's just another grift.
Takes one to know one.
Also, it may be deeper than a mere scam. It looks like an organized attempt to damage faith in our space program. Now who would try to do that? I'd like the chicken fuk-yu and some steamed rice and a couple of spring rolls, waiter.
Why would you trust the us gov? That's incredibly foolish.
You're making the logical argument fallacy that if a piece of something is bad, all rest of the thing is bad.
Ah, the retard herd strikes with downvotes. I am so scared I just pissed in my pants. My favorite pants. You're going down for this, I sweasr.
How many bad pieces does one need to find before it's a statistic?
Sounds more like you are making that exact error by assuming that any of it is good because you once found a good piece.
You're a fucking idiot and deflecting from your bad logic. I wonder whose alt you are.