Background
Everything on the scale of "the New World Order" happens very slowly. The reason this is the case is that these are very big movements that take a long time, and one of the added benefits for the perpetrators is that it's difficult for people to wrap their brain around what's going on at any given moment.
Lead Up
We look at all the things that have taken place since 1913, we can see a pattern, we can understand some of the high-level goals (e.g., control over currency, trade, communications, basic world domination 101 stuff, etc.). We can see how some of the puzzle pieces fit together, such as creating a separated (from the state) central bank in every country, slaughtering (typically via war) potential threats to future plans, invasion-level migration of third world mongrels to destabilize regions, creation of false dichotomies and false cold wars (Russia, Iran, etc.) to keep local energies focused on global goals, etc.
Economics
Understanding the economics of a situation gives better insight than any other means of gleaning such information. I don't mean economics in the strictly modern sense; I mean the economics of energy availability and effort required for particular actions. for example, if a city had a giant tank of natural gas, and the neighboring city was running short on natural gas but had a large standing military, you could use this kind of economics to understand the most likely outcome, which would be the invasion by the militarized neighboring city, specifically for the acquisition of the neighbors natural gas resources.
As an example of using this kind of economics to understand geopolitical outcomes, make a map and plot every major conflict since World War II. You'll find that nearly every conflict either borders China or borders a bordering country of China (Afghanistan, Pakistan, North vs South Vietnam, North vs South Korea), or borders a major trade/oil territory (Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Israel, again Afghanistan and Pakistan (oil + natural gas pipelines), etc.). Most outcomes are obvious when you understand the underlying economics.
Creation of the Enemy
In every place where Africans are imported, there is a very consistent cycle:
- Keep them segregated (by legal means, welfare ghettos, etc.) to prevent any cultural integration
- Make them feel like victims of their host country's oppression
- Activate them from time to time ("color revolutions", BLM 1.0 and BLM 2.0 (George Floyd), the current situation in France, etc.)
- Create a nurturing response to foster an animal / keeper feedback-driven relationship with the state and state partners (welfare, reparations, social items, like BLM banners at Nike, etc.).
- Repeat steps
What's Coming
Firstly, have a quick look at the population growth/projections, in Africa (purple line):
We know that Africans are used by TPTB to affect the change that they wish to see. I don't want to get into their reasons for specifically using Africans (vs any other group), because those reasons are mostly known and obvious, and that's not the point here.
Our flanks (most of the eastern seaboard, California, Oregon, Washington, the northern Midwest bordering Canada, Southern Texas, etc.) have undergone demoralization, pushing patriotic / gun owning Americans out (think of the flight from, e.g., New York into Florida, California and Oregon into Utah, Colorado, and Idaho, etc.), and further consolidating control into the hands of the enemy who wields these Africans like a weapon of war.
Apply the framework that I'm describing (WRT economics, etc.) to what you see in the chart, and think of the corroborating circumstances you know about (Africans coming across the Mexican border, africans being implanted into every Western country, etc.), and a pretty bleak picture should immediately begin to form in your mind.
The population in Africa has been supported by TPTB and their various NGO over the past 50 years. They are creating an army to invade and destroy all of the west, and the relentless migrations that we've seen thus far are only the very beginning. Many of these African nations will be activated and put into high gear, with further help from NGO and other powers, sending tens of millions of Africans all over the place, with secret caches of weapons stashed away for the right moment. When all of this coalesces these subtle and covert operations will be come overt, and The numbers will be overwhelming.
I don't mean for this to be some kind of a nihilistic black pill post, but I don't think we will survive this. The numbers are just too great, the planning is too great, the communications are completely controlled, and the number of Africans that will be imported between now and when the final stage of the plan begins is too great. If every western nation was armed at the population level the way the US was, we might stand a chance. But with Canada being completely disarmed, Mexico being pure chaos, all of Europe completely disarmed, and no other real prospects for real opposition, the way that it will play out is:
War
- Global war will expand
- Europe - chaos and civil war
- US - balkanization
- US - war between regions (e.g., northeast vs region bordering to the south and west)
- Assets deployed to Africa during global war will begin mobilizing populations in western sub-Saharan Africa
- During the chaos in Europe and the US, large contingent of Africans will be dumped, with small arms (Chinese made assault weapons), into both Europe and the US
- China will "partner" with Canada and place a large invasion force along the US and Canada border, both on the west and east coast
- Chinese forces will work in concert with DC-based forces to quell resistance along US regional borders
- US interior states will be completely cut off from global trade, and will be hard-pressed to produce enough resources to keep up with the demanding requirements of any remaining resistance
- Beyond this, your guess is as good as mine, but I think you're getting the picture at this point
Closing
I don't have any kind of secret knowledge or proof that any of this will happen. This is just what I have felt to be the approximate plan, based largely on economics and "this is how I would do it" style thinking, for many years. And much of what we are seeing heavily corroborates this, including the installation of our fake president, the secret partnerships with China, the Migrations we are already seeing take place, the continual use of the exact same George Floyd style pattern of population division, and the United States internal migrations that ramped up in 2020.
You might be overthinking this a bit. Or at least I look at it differently. The marxists realized that pitting the proles (working class) against the Bourgeoisie (themselves) was kind of stupid because both are needed and by killing the Bourgeoisie and taking their stuff they collapsed society. Instead an alliance of the Bourgeoisie and lumpenproles (criminals, perverts and welfare scum) against the proles and then simply bleeding them was a more sustainable situation. Lumpenproles and Proles are both distracted by each other and never turn against the Bourgeoisie who get rich with their nonsense programs the massive lumpenprole voter base secures.
(((Some))) are doing this to exterminate us, but most are just greedy and powerhungry. So they'll try to keep it going forever. The problem is the sweet spot for them is a massively decreased standard of living for us. Once the country is a barely functional hellscape of mostly poor people they'll try to dial it back (this is already happening.)
I disagree. In the African bush wars back in the 60s and 70s you saw kill counts of 100 to 1 or 1000 to 1 in favor of whites even though they had minimal tech advantage.
If the US devolves into a race war the numbers will matter far less than you think.
I hope you're right. My intention is not to blackpills people, but my instinct tells me this will be very different Than the bush wars, because the powers that be and all of their technology and control over communications will be wielded to great effect while remote controlling the mindless drones via very basic commands.
More likely if a civil war comes to the US it will be red v blue (at least initially) than white v black.
Plus there are more factions than black and white, there are mexicans and asians. Mexicans are more of a threat to the whites, but everyone will ally against black. Blacks really have no chance of winning an open race war. Asians and whites have no trouble working together. Mexicans and whites can likely come to an agreement.
The 2 real questions are:
The 2nd is up in the air, and largely depends on the first.
The first, the jews have painted themselves into a corner. They can only parasite off white civilizations, and they been too evil of late. Everyone now knows it's us or them.
I think you're oversimplifying the bad guys. This isn't going to be an organic race war. If there is one side that has an advantage over the other, that's the side that will be wheeled it against the other.
You really have to oversimply these things to talk about them. The truth is there are a thousand factors happening at once. To have non-state violence on a massive scale is a matter of the participants feeling justified, and typically feeling like they'll win or suffer little blowback. It's really hard to say what that will look like and who will be on either side because these feelings are often spur of the moment and totally situational.