((They)) also believe in curses. Curses only work when one is rightfully angered and the curse is spoken aloud. But the public has been conditioned not to speak aloud of the wrongdoings of Jews.
Curses will not harm someone who is innocent;. they are like sparrows or swallows that fly around and never land. Proverbs 26:2
you signed the consent form to take the poison and on the consent form it said there could be side effects
What is easier...suggesting poison; consent forms and side-effect lists or consenting to poison self; while ignoring side-effects?
In other words...is it easier to suggest a temptation or to consent to it?
So when you die, its your fault...
What's the implication of "self" sustenance?
(((They))) believe...
A many believe by consenting to what is being suggested to them by a few...who's suggesting anything for the few to believe?
Which mind is less restricted by the suggestions from others...those who consent to believe or those who suggest others to consent to believe?
to have poison injected into your infant's body so the death or disability of your child is your fault, not ((theirs)).
a) if poison represents the sacrificial altar; then who brings the child to it? Are the needle-jews coming to the children or are the parents bringing their children to the needle-jews?
b) what has more effect on parents consenting to the needle-jews...the suggestions by the needle-jews to come or the social pressure from others suggesting one to go the needle-jews?
c) does nature have a perceivable fault or could it be those within nature ignoring perceivable for suggested, which leads to them experiencing faults?
d) what if a parasitic few represent the fault of an ignorant many; hence ignorance representing the host for parasitic exploitation? Furthermore...what if ignorance prevents one from seeing the balance (opportunity) underneath a host/parasite dynamic?
((They)) also believe in curses. Curses only work when one is rightfully angered and the curse is spoken aloud. But the public has been conditioned not to speak aloud of the wrongdoings of Jews.
Curses will not harm someone who is innocent;. they are like sparrows or swallows that fly around and never land. Proverbs 26:2
What is easier...suggesting poison; consent forms and side-effect lists or consenting to poison self; while ignoring side-effects?
In other words...is it easier to suggest a temptation or to consent to it?
What's the implication of "self" sustenance?
A many believe by consenting to what is being suggested to them by a few...who's suggesting anything for the few to believe?
Which mind is less restricted by the suggestions from others...those who consent to believe or those who suggest others to consent to believe?
a) if poison represents the sacrificial altar; then who brings the child to it? Are the needle-jews coming to the children or are the parents bringing their children to the needle-jews?
b) what has more effect on parents consenting to the needle-jews...the suggestions by the needle-jews to come or the social pressure from others suggesting one to go the needle-jews?
c) does nature have a perceivable fault or could it be those within nature ignoring perceivable for suggested, which leads to them experiencing faults?
d) what if a parasitic few represent the fault of an ignorant many; hence ignorance representing the host for parasitic exploitation? Furthermore...what if ignorance prevents one from seeing the balance (opportunity) underneath a host/parasite dynamic?