The plot is definitely thicker than the old "died suddenly", although I suspect they will sell that as the explanation. Even conspiracy theorists will stop there because they can blame the vaxx. Shills will sell it, and actual conspiracists will buy it because they love to "know the answer".
Three data points appear to rule out that explanation. First, according to the flight data shown in this story, the plane made a U-turn:
I haven't yet read anywhere whether the pilot filed a flight plan and, if so, what the destination was, but the U-turn was over the southwestern end of Long Island then back towards DC. This alone rules out a plane just tooling along on autopilot.
Second, and worse, the F-16 sent after the plane. The fighter went screaming out there causing a huge sonic boom and lots of panic on the ground then... what? The F-16 should have been able to get a look into the cockpit and also see people at the cabin windows, but notice there's absolutely no information about this and the issue is not even raised.
Third, and worst, the linked article from The Sun twice repeats the pilot "reportedly lost consciousness". Reportedly? Reported by who? A tweet linked in the GWP story mentioned NORDO so it was not anyone else in the plane. And that line comes from "investigators" who have neither names nor organizations. This story was clearly fabricated and planted in the The Sun.
So what did happen? Working theory: remote hijack with disconnection of radio systems. I'd guess the plan was for the aircraft to fly over restricted airspace then be shot down very spectacularly and very publicly near DC. Maybe the military refused to play their little part in this so the plane was just intentionally crashed.
Why? This is warning to Trump that supporters will be murdered, families will not be immune, and the blood is on him.
They would be safer flying commercial and taking public transportation instead of private planes and vehicles they are too easily singled and taken out
I would agree but on the flip side we have incidents like AF447 and that GermanWings flight. Those also looked like remote hijackings, and I don't recall anyone even guessing why They would do it.
That leaves three possibilities. One, they took out plane loads of people just to hit one or a small number, lost in the rest of the crowd. Two, they were maybe tests not of the technology itself, but whether they could crash planes and people would buy cockamamie theories about why. Three, we live in a world where planes fall out of the sky for cockamamie reasons.
I think we always have to keep in mind this quote from former Pentagon CID Investigator Gene Wheaton:
The covert operators that I ran with would blow up a 747 with 300 people to kill one person. They are total sociopaths with no conscience whatsoever.
The plot is definitely thicker than the old "died suddenly", although I suspect they will sell that as the explanation. Even conspiracy theorists will stop there because they can blame the vaxx. Shills will sell it, and actual conspiracists will buy it because they love to "know the answer".
Three data points appear to rule out that explanation. First, according to the flight data shown in this story, the plane made a U-turn:
DC Boom Mystery Deepens: Reports Jets Scrambled for Plane Headed to Nation’s Capital; Plane Later Crashed in Rural Virginia (The Gateway Pundit)
I haven't yet read anywhere whether the pilot filed a flight plan and, if so, what the destination was, but the U-turn was over the southwestern end of Long Island then back towards DC. This alone rules out a plane just tooling along on autopilot.
Second, and worse, the F-16 sent after the plane. The fighter went screaming out there causing a huge sonic boom and lots of panic on the ground then... what? The F-16 should have been able to get a look into the cockpit and also see people at the cabin windows, but notice there's absolutely no information about this and the issue is not even raised.
Third, and worst, the linked article from The Sun twice repeats the pilot "reportedly lost consciousness". Reportedly? Reported by who? A tweet linked in the GWP story mentioned NORDO so it was not anyone else in the plane. And that line comes from "investigators" who have neither names nor organizations. This story was clearly fabricated and planted in the The Sun.
So what did happen? Working theory: remote hijack with disconnection of radio systems. I'd guess the plan was for the aircraft to fly over restricted airspace then be shot down very spectacularly and very publicly near DC. Maybe the military refused to play their little part in this so the plane was just intentionally crashed.
Why? This is warning to Trump that supporters will be murdered, families will not be immune, and the blood is on him.
They would be safer flying commercial and taking public transportation instead of private planes and vehicles they are too easily singled and taken out
I wouldn't put it beyond the CIA to murder hundreds of innocents to cover up getting one high value target.
I would agree but on the flip side we have incidents like AF447 and that GermanWings flight. Those also looked like remote hijackings, and I don't recall anyone even guessing why They would do it.
That leaves three possibilities. One, they took out plane loads of people just to hit one or a small number, lost in the rest of the crowd. Two, they were maybe tests not of the technology itself, but whether they could crash planes and people would buy cockamamie theories about why. Three, we live in a world where planes fall out of the sky for cockamamie reasons.
I think we always have to keep in mind this quote from former Pentagon CID Investigator Gene Wheaton: