So, the article says that there is nanotech, but the intentions can sometimes be different. That's what I think. Also, it says that there are nano particles in titanium dioxide, not that it is the nanotechnology.
Yes, the article is bullshit, the source never mentions nanotechnology and you just parrot stuff you don't understand because "nanotechnology" sounds scary.
Do you think that nanoparticles are "nanotechnology"?
No, I don't and I actually read through the article and made sure it said what I said it did, which you clearly did not do. I was trying to show people here how there is nanotech in food, which I found out. Also, they mention nanotechnology multiple times, (even in the title) how did you miss it?!?! Some quotes: "At least, that's where my head immediately went while reading the adequately scary "Eating Nano" in E Magazine. The article, which appeared in last month's issue, details exactly how nanotechnology has found its way into our food supply." "Except that, in regards to nanotechnology, "safety-testing" is treated in a "we'll fix it when it's broke" kind of way:"
"Among the foods most likely to have nano-tech : Foods with caramelized sugar, nutritional supplements, toothpastes, gums, M&Ms, Jello Banana Cream Pudding, Pop Tarts, Mentos, Nestle Original Coffee Creamer, and even... purified water!" And you called me illiterate.
So, the article says that there is nanotech, but the intentions can sometimes be different. That's what I think. Also, it says that there are nano particles in titanium dioxide, not that it is the nanotechnology.
I mean, I've heard that titanium dioxide is bad for you, I'm not sure about that, though.
You dumb, illiterate cretin.
If you read the whole thing you would see that they also call it nanotechnology, that's what they are. Please actually read the whole article.
Yes, the article is bullshit, the source never mentions nanotechnology and you just parrot stuff you don't understand because "nanotechnology" sounds scary.
Do you think that nanoparticles are "nanotechnology"?
No, I don't and I actually read through the article and made sure it said what I said it did, which you clearly did not do. I was trying to show people here how there is nanotech in food, which I found out. Also, they mention nanotechnology multiple times, (even in the title) how did you miss it?!?! Some quotes: "At least, that's where my head immediately went while reading the adequately scary "Eating Nano" in E Magazine. The article, which appeared in last month's issue, details exactly how nanotechnology has found its way into our food supply." "Except that, in regards to nanotechnology, "safety-testing" is treated in a "we'll fix it when it's broke" kind of way:" "Among the foods most likely to have nano-tech : Foods with caramelized sugar, nutritional supplements, toothpastes, gums, M&Ms, Jello Banana Cream Pudding, Pop Tarts, Mentos, Nestle Original Coffee Creamer, and even... purified water!" And you called me illiterate.
There is no nanotechnology in food. There are nanoparticles. This has nothing to do with actual nanotechnology.
Words have meaning.
Yes, they do, and nanotechnology means what it means. If you actually read and understood you see that. I think you're trolling at this point.
Turn to Jesus while there's still time, Eisenhorn.
He can save even you.