Table of Contents
- 210k excess deaths
- 18.7% increase in vaxxed death rate
- Vaxx reduces lifespan 13.2 years (15.6%)
- Discussion
- Venues
- Pension management
- Assumptions
- Excess death causation
210k excess deaths
It is incredible that face-saving Japan is more transparent about this debacle than the USA. An ethnostate is more motivated to care about its citizens more than an empire of immigrants, which can always import more.
Japan Records Highest Excess Deaths since WWII, Officials Demand Truth | Slay News
Japan reported 210k excess deaths in 2022. Excess deaths mean more died than expected, given the population age structure. The obvious cause is the vaccine, as examining the weekly deaths shows.
This doesn't sound like a big deal, right? Japan's population is 125.7m, so 210k is only 0.167% of the population.
Here's what a linear extrapolation implies. The mRNA vaxx is a gene therapy that causes recurring reinfection, so these numbers may get better or worse.
18.7% increase in vaxxed death rate
Japan's death rate is climbing naturally due to low birth rate resulting in an aging population. So directly comparing prior years would exaggerate the effect of the mRNA vaxx. I'll have to trust the demographic estimates. At least Japan isn't as bad as China about juking stats.
- The Ministry of Health reports 1,582,033 deaths in 2022, including some Japanese living abroad. Not quite what I want, but close enough.
- 210k of those are excess deaths; 1.37m are expected. Thus deaths are 15.3% higher than expected.
- 82% of Japanese had at least one mRNA vaccine dose.
- Adjusted death rate increase after removing unvaxxed: 15.3% / 82% = 18.7%
Let's call this estimate conservative, since Japanese government demographers are probably loath to publish numbers that imply their superiors have committed democide.
Vaxx reduces lifespan 13.2 years (15.6%)
- Average Japanese lifespan is 84.6 years.
- This means virtual death rate is 1 / 84.6 = 1.18%
I'm creating this "virtual death rate" solely as an intermediate step in the calculation. It is inversely proportional to lifespan.
The "virtual death rate" is what would happen if you had an ideal population of mice that reproduced and died like clockwork, maintaining a stable population size.
If you had 100 virtual mice with a lifespan of one year, 100% of them would be dead in a year. The virtual death rate is 100%. If their lifespan increases to 100 years, the virtual death rate is 1%.
(This ignores demographic issues such as Japan's collapsing birthrate, which are irrelevant for the purposes of calculating lifespan reduction. Obviously death rate gets higher when a population ages. We don't care what Japan's ACTUAL death rate was in 2022.)
Now I can multiply the "virtual death rate" by the INCREASE in death rate caused by vaccination. It's apples to apples.
- Vaxxed virtual death rate is 1.18% * 118.7% = 1.40%
- Vaxxed lifespan is 1 / 1.40% = 71.4 years
- Vaxx costs 84.6 - 71.4 = 13.2 years
- That's 13.2 / 84.6 = 15.6% of lifespan
Discussion
Venues
Pension management
wereonit
Every developed nation is having a retirement and pension crisis.
Perhaps it was unwise to give governments a massive financial incentive to kill senior citizens? Killing people is one of the few things governments do well. I wouldn't want a hitman to owe me a pension. Especially one he can't pay.
gaseous-ice
Klaus schwab (at 1:30):
"It vill be a young world"
"Hopefully not suddenly," he says.
loveforyouandme
Sounds like it was perfectly calculated and executed.
But they’re incompetent, right?!
The ones who calculated won't be the ones executed.
Assumptions
You don't adjust for xyz factor.
One can criticize lots of the assumptions made here, but the biggest one is that the present excess death rate will continue. The others pale in comparison.
The purpose of this post is merely to show that although the current yearly excess deaths may look unimpressive next to the total population size, they cannot be ignored.
Could you have 100 virtual mice with an average lifespan of one year, but not all would be dead in a year? jeopardy music
That's why I didn't say "average lifespan". The lifespan of the virtual mice is exactly one year.
I could've simply skipped the step of creating the virtual death rate, and divided by the increase in vaxxed death rate instead. The extra steps are merely there for clarity, for people who are uncomfortable working with ratios.
Death rate and lifespan are inversely proportional. Double one, halve the other, ceteris paribus.
This type of reasoning about a scenario with ratios is commonly tested on the GMAT, if you want to practice. It has practical applications!
Excess death causation
Proud-American
The big thing you missed is the excess deaths aren’t unaccounted. There’s categories. Excess suicides, excess traffic accidents, excess overdoses, and so on.
Yes, the shot might harm you, but you’ve conflated excess with unknown and it makes your argument invalid.
No, I think the clot shot is causing all those categories. Brain damage.
BasedHere
The way Mark Steyn described it in his recent Delingpole interview (/how he said a doctor had described it - I can't remember exactly) he said it was like the vax aged people and brought fwd health conditions. eg people in 40s getting the stroke they'd have in their 60s.
Sounds incurable.
DonJr2024
From what I have seen in my own circles, this all sounds accurate.
10+ deaths that I attribute to the vaxx. Half of them people under 60.
And even more alarming: the number of weird diseases and shit going on with people who are still alive. Unlike their "I'm vaccinated" profile badges, they don't announce proudly that their kid just got Type 1 diabetes. Or that they have MS suddenly in their 40s. Or that they felt weird "funny bone sensation" start at their shoulder and slowly move down the arm, to the fingertips and then back up.
All that stuff only comes out in person, after the social talk, after a beer or two.
Excess deaths already factors aging demographics. That's why they're excess, not expected.
Does elderly population exaggerate the vaxx's effect, or understate it?
Percentage increases are crazy high for vaxxed young healthy people. For example, military cancer reporting rate went up 300%. Heart attacks and strokes in children is probably even crazier. So actually I think this may still be an underestimate, yikes.
Good thinking to question that skew, though.
That's the question. In some other countries like UK, young people are dying while elderlies aren't affected that much.
My guess is, older people who survived the initial wave of covid (unlike unhealthy westerners who died from covid) are starting die now because of the immune suppression due to the jab, but who knows.
Japanese population is still stuck in Cold War-like world view where China/NK/Russia are the bad guys while US good. They are blind to the globalist takeover. 3 shots per person on average is just fucking ridiculous, that's the close second highest in the world.
I suspect the elderly are dropping to the vaxx everywhere, but that Japan is uniquely focused on honestly reporting excess mortality because their aging and dying population is already a hugely sensitive issue threatening national survival. So they can't just fudge the expected-deaths number higher to CYA; it's already too grim.