Did Hitler escape to Argentina? (Start at 19 min 30 sec)
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
The Hitler issue is complicated, I know a lot of people here think he was working for the jews because of how he rose to power, the transfer agreement, Dunkirk and the catastrophic results on Germany.
I am still reading on the topic but my take is that it's complicated!
First, jewish subversion works not just in puppetry at the very top, it also works in manipulating ideas. The ideology the national socialist Germans were following had some of its roots in jewish subversion (i.e. Darwinism was pushed by jews), similar infiltration goes to Thule and Vril societies.
Second, the very top jews indeed wanted a war to destroy Germany, punish assimilated jews, increase immigration to Palestine and create their criminal headquarters so called israel, so they didn't mind Hitler coming to power if not funded and pushed him and they did indeed want a war between communism and National Socialism.
Third, the jewish powers believed they could always control things their way because they controlled America and had many spies inside Germany such as Wilhelm Canaris and Hjalmar Schacht.
Fourth, were things get complicated is I believe after Hitler saw that things were not going according to plan (whatever agreements he might have had with the English aristocracy or jewish bankers), the war was for real but almost impossible to win.
So you can say he was duped, we will never know the details. But to say Hitler was a complete jewish agent is far from accurate or being honest.
Also Hitler had 100k+ Jewish soldiers and high ranking people in the NS government. There was a book written about that and I don't think it's been disputed. Ron Unz wrote an article about it. If you were full jew or 50% jew that was considered to be "Jewish." 1/4th jew was not considered jew in NS Germany.
I have never seen any actual evidence that the Vril Society, Maria Orsic, etc. existed. I think all of that is a complete hoax. The guy that wrote Vril: The Coming Race was a Rosicrucian and Robert Sepehr is a Jew and a Freemason. I think the Vril thing, Esoteric Hitlerism, etc. is a 100% jew psy-op.
Madame Blavatsky was into the Aryan race, root races, and Atlantis which the Annenerbe was into.
Freemasons revere the Swastika. That doesn't mean the swastika is bad because it was on Catholic graves in Rome almost 2,000 years ago, but it is still relevant information to know that Freemasons (i.e. Albert Pike) like the swastika.
I don't think Hitler is controlled opposition, but I read some of this PDF in this YouTube video description a few weeks ago and it made me very depressed. Hitler was not a Catholic or a Protestant. I think that the reason the Catholic Church sided with him was because they knew Hitler was fighting against the New World Order and they were just doing everything they could to stop Judaism/Freemasonry/Bolshevism from spreading. It's pretty annoying that Dennis Wise pushes the Hitler was a Catholic narrative when he most certainly was not. Hitler was a major heretic. I like the Aryan race stuff because it united Germany, but Hitler most certainly was not a Catholic or a Protestant.
Because Hitler was not a Christian this opens things up to him possibly being a Germanic Pagan/Satanist or a Freemason/Jew. I don't really think he was either. I think he was just a lapsed Catholic in apostasy and probably had his own unique religious beliefs pulling from many sources. Altiyan Childs showed the National Socialist's doing Freemason symbolism but Dennis Wise did a decent job refuting this. The Nazi's executed tens of thousands of Freemasons, imprisoned jews, and killed some Rothschild's. It would just be such a massive psy-op if Hitler was basically "in on it." The Soviet's could have taken over Western Europe if they had wanted to but they were failing and Hitler tried to protect Western Europe. If the Jews/Freemasons wanted to orchestrate WW2 I don't think they would need to round up all of the Jews into concentration camps. Although I know that there are people who say putting the jews in camps actually protected the jews and saved them from allied bombings on cities.
The transfer agreements weren't extensive enough. Only tens of thousands of jews out of millions got transferred to Palestine. Hitler was just a good person and didn't want to outright murder unarmed people... He worked with Zionists to just get the jews out. I don't think he had the foresight on this. And again it wasn't like he was transferring hundreds of thousands of jews. It was just in the tens of thousands.
You do raise good points about Hitler being voted into power. Maybe the jews just thought he was too popular and they couldn't rig it against him? Maybe they thought they could control him? I don't think voting in the U.S. has ever been real because America was created by Jews and Freemasons, but maybe things were slightly different in Germany... The voting thing is definitely tough.
Also Kyle Hunt on Renegade Tribune said something on Gab or Twitter I think last December about how Hitler wanted to phase out meat in Germany after WW2 ended. That certainly would point to Hitler being controlled but I haven't investigated this claim at all. All I know is that Hitler was mostly vegetarian.
Thank you for the detailed reply, a lot of information in it. I am going to save it.
Yes, we are on the same page. Those who say Hitler was jewish or completely controlled really do not know the details and have not read extensively on the topic. That's why I actually think people like Henry Makow are disinfo because they keep pushing the narrative that Hitler was freemason/jewish or their puppet.
I haven't dug deeply into vril and I would not be surprised if it was indeed a con.
I think Hitler was most certainly not Christian, I think he was well intentioned though but had a flawed ideology. He underestimated jewish power and he didn't realize that the English were completely bent on destroying Germany.
My take is that jewish "support" for Hitler was subtle and only on a macro level. Regardless if he got to power on his own or not and how the NS were funded. Remains the fact that they did not kill Hitler nor did they completely attack Germany or lay siege on it as he got into power. The jews in power in the US and Britain saw were things were going but took no immediate action.
They wanted war to happen so they obliterate the Germans and create israel. They could not have done that if Germany wasn't allowed to be built up to the extent it did.
I do not think the meat issue should be taken against him, he was vegetarian after all.
Another indisputable proof that Hitler was not working for the jews is the fact that later after the war started he trained Palestinians fighting against the English and jewish invaders in Palestine. (I am well versed on the topic if you ever have any questions)
The problem with Hitler is that he wasn't consistent, it's like someone confused about whether to speed up or completely hit the brakes on a traffic light. On one side he wants to be good for his people and Humanity in general as he views it and he even wants to be good with animals.
On the other hand he thought England had a good effect on the Indians and he supported the Zionists and didn't see the damage he is doing to Palestinians by sending jews to Palestine, nor the indiscriminate maltreatment of all jews or Russians. One needs to pick sides, either you are completely moral or completely immoral. He was neither.
I can elaborate and add links on all of the things in my original post if you need.
I follow Henry Makow too and yes I agree with you. Makow claims that his parents died in I believe Poland at the hands of Nazi's and that the Nazi's really did systematically genocide Jews. And then he claims that Hitler killed the non-Illuminati jews in the concentration camps and that in reality it is only high-level Jews/Freemasons/Illuminati in charge. It's a controlled narrative for sure. Regular day to day jews in Germany were Communists, pro-Soviet, and played a part in creating the horrible Weimar era conditions in Germany. There are way too many wartime documents that were seized and if Hitler was controlled I think smarter historians such as David Irving would have noticed. There just isn't enough concrete evidence of Hitler being controlled. Hitler specifically chose to not bomb ancient structures, monuments, and civilians in Allied nations. There aren't even lodge records or anything showing that Hitler and other high ranking NS officers were Freemasons. Maybe the Nazi's just destroyed the records of them being Freemasons? For U.S. President's there are lodge records that you can look at.
I think Hitler had good intentions as well. He was trying to unite all of the ideological factions in Germany because he needed a united nation to win the war. If he too Catholic or too Protestant he would have been alienating too many people. Having race as the uniting thing made sense because everyone in Germany was of the same race. He was desperate and just trying to fix Germany as quickly as possible.
There was the failed communist revolution in Germany in 1918-1919 that was completely jewish. Surely it would have been preferable for the jews to just repeat the process that they used in Russia/Ukraine with the Bolshevik Revolution, purges, gulags, and the Holodomor. That process killed tens of millions of people in Eastern Europe. I guess the jews wanted a world war so that they could get America involved... America was manufacturing and selling weapons and military equipment to the Allies in Europe and that enriched (((America))) with a supply of gold after the war. And then after the war the United Nations, IMF, World Bank, Bretton Woods, etc. were all set-up and America now had the world's reserve currency and basically became the new world's military and economic superpower. I guess it's possible that because the 1918-1919 communist revolution was a failure in Germany that the jews backed Hitler as a secondary option so that they could build up Germany and then start a world war. But I still don't think Hitler was controlled.
Also agree with the creating Israel part. Regular jews did not want to move to the desert in Palestine so the higher level jews needed something that would motivate the regular jews to want to move to Palestine in the middle east. Concentration camps definitely would have been beneficial to getting those regular jews to want to move to Palestine after the war. I don't know what the exact numbers are though on this.
Hi there, not sure if you will get this.
Just a quick question. Did you ever come across Miles Mathis' work? I am reading this one: http://mileswmathis.com/hiller.pdf and I am not sure what to make of it.
A lot of his connections and research seems to be basically a play on names. Some of his stuff checks out but others I am not sure really. Not sure if his work aims for the truth, or if it was deliberate disinfo. If you ever come across and have any conclusions I would appreciate any findings, thanks.
While the actual numbers of jewish immigrants from Germany itself did not constitute the bulk of jewish immigration into Palestine. The rise of NS in Germany was a driving factor in increasing it from other countries as well. A solid peace of work on this topic is this book but I am not sure if it was ever translated into English or German.
By 1936-1938 Palestine has reached its limits in the ability to absorb jewish immigrants and the English had to curb it due to Arab revolts. It's quite telling the war started soon after.
Had Hitler been as completely evil as they portray him, Germany would have won the war.
Exactly!! jews are persistent, that's the secret to their success. They spend hours, days on end discussing all aspects of the topic, fighting and arguing until they reach the best decision.
jewish control and subversion is subtle and complicated. Many people falsely claim this or that leader is jewish or freemason because it appears that he advanced jewish goals. While in reality sometimes the jew would simply go with the flow, make few assassinations here or there, give some money to this or that organization without them even ever knowing it's coming from the jews just to get their man into power.
Only thing is that their man is not their man!!! What I mean by their man, is simply someone whom they believe have the personality type they need!!
I do not think Hitler was ever directly controlled or even indirectly, I also think he was honest in his endeavor. Like all true Germans he was too honest for his own good. BUT the jews probably thought Hitler and the NS had the characteristics they need and the ideology that would further their plans.
This pattern is done often by the CIA/MI6/Mossad. They promote someone to power who has the personality they need and he will then do all they want without even knowing it himself!
All it takes is few assassinations to eliminate any potential rivals and some funding to promote their unwitting man. This funding can come through fronts that can never be suspected of having jewish affiliations. I have seen many examples of this.
Yasser Arafat meant well for his people, but in fact, the jews promoted him through oil money because they thought he was a lesser evil than the alternatives. Through the years they assassinated the ones they deemed dangerous. And when the time came and Arafat has unwittingly achieved all they wanted and he too became a burden they assassinated him as well.