Eat more shit, cause that is how you like it dirty infected leftist, mental disease is revealed in each and every post you make, you are a disease upon this forum, a disgusting filthy lying sack of shit.
Useless, you will never get anything good from me, your account is a disgusting reveal on your criminal mind, this is my last response to you loser.
Jesus Christ, you're so boring. You have no intellectual ground to stand on, so you have to resort to this inane "you're a leftist / criminal / piece of shit" schoolyard routine. I can tell you're embarrassed because you've been thoroughly dunked-on. It's okay, we all make mistakes.
Just admit that the meme you posted was low-IQ boomer-tier garbage. Be a man.
There are real problems with the OP article and stance, but also substance for some of it. As far back as 2005 Putin was consistently telling the world what conditions would cause him to go to war over Ukraine. It was actually worse before he officially invaded, although the rebels in the east wouldn't have been able to do anything without Russian assistance.
That means 4 US administrations could have prevented this war, yet none lifted a finger to stop it. Since there were two Presidents from each party that tells us this comes from higher up than elected Officials.
It's a leap to claim that the goal is "regime change." Typically US does that by military action; we aren't invading Russia. When you talk about weakening either Russia or Putin, you're talking about ending the war militarily, without invading or attacking Russia at all. I don't think that strategy can possibly succeed, but Russia at full strength could make the war more difficult. None of this is surprising.
The article also cites elections as reasons to give Crimea and the Donbas to Russia; that's a very tired argument.
Define Khazaria, quick.
Eat more shit, cause that is how you like it dirty infected leftist, mental disease is revealed in each and every post you make, you are a disease upon this forum, a disgusting filthy lying sack of shit.
Useless, you will never get anything good from me, your account is a disgusting reveal on your criminal mind, this is my last response to you loser.
Beat it.
Jesus Christ, you're so boring. You have no intellectual ground to stand on, so you have to resort to this inane "you're a leftist / criminal / piece of shit" schoolyard routine. I can tell you're embarrassed because you've been thoroughly dunked-on. It's okay, we all make mistakes.
Just admit that the meme you posted was low-IQ boomer-tier garbage. Be a man.
you're glowing :)
OP says these same things all the time.
There are real problems with the OP article and stance, but also substance for some of it. As far back as 2005 Putin was consistently telling the world what conditions would cause him to go to war over Ukraine. It was actually worse before he officially invaded, although the rebels in the east wouldn't have been able to do anything without Russian assistance.
That means 4 US administrations could have prevented this war, yet none lifted a finger to stop it. Since there were two Presidents from each party that tells us this comes from higher up than elected Officials.
It's a leap to claim that the goal is "regime change." Typically US does that by military action; we aren't invading Russia. When you talk about weakening either Russia or Putin, you're talking about ending the war militarily, without invading or attacking Russia at all. I don't think that strategy can possibly succeed, but Russia at full strength could make the war more difficult. None of this is surprising.
The article also cites elections as reasons to give Crimea and the Donbas to Russia; that's a very tired argument.