We have an abstract, a plain language summary, TTE posts and a podcast and Carl and I have written a Spectator piece covering the review. If you are a real masochist, you can read all the 300-plus pages of the review. I even gave the interview I mentioned previously, but I am not planning any more outings. So there is nothing to explain or fact-check. But the stringer is not really interested in checking facts. What they want to do is to write truthfully that they have spoken to one of us and then put the spin required in the release to ensure the “misinterpretation” of twitterati is set straight. “Debunking” is the term used, and it will be actioned if the stringer thinks the Twitterati have “misinterpreted” our findings.
You coming here, with your "hurr durr not deboonked" attitude is literally part of the problem. Fuck off.
It's over.
Watch this interview with the lead author of the mask study.
or read this:
Fact checkers are now seeking to “debunk” the mask debate, but Tom Jefferson is not having a bar of it!
You coming here, with your "hurr durr not deboonked" attitude is literally part of the problem. Fuck off.