But my point is valid, that they are disappearing eggs for a reason. It could be what I said in the other comment (they are good against the virus OR vaccine), and another possibility is that so they can introduce agents that sterilize humans.
It is known that the chicken feed renders chicken sterile. Maybe they are trying to get it so the chickens don't get sterile but the people do.
SARS-CoV-2 (100PFU) was incubated with an equal volume of Pre-IgY, S-2-IgY and Remdesivir in different concentration gradients in VeroE6 cells. The results showed that different doses of S-IgY had an obvious inhibitory effect on the cellular SARS-CoV-2 content (copy number) with EC50 of 27.78 ± 1.54 nM. Remdesivir’s EC50 against SARS-CoV-2 was 3259 ± 159.62 nM,
The inhibitory effect of S-IgY on SARS-Cov-2 replication was 106 times stronger more than that of Remdesivir In vitro (Fig.7.)."
They do not give values for how potent the Pre-IgY immunoglobulin is!
I know, that's why I called him out.
But my point is valid, that they are disappearing eggs for a reason. It could be what I said in the other comment (they are good against the virus OR vaccine), and another possibility is that so they can introduce agents that sterilize humans.
It is known that the chicken feed renders chicken sterile. Maybe they are trying to get it so the chickens don't get sterile but the people do.
I did read it. There is no control.
"5.2 qRT-PCR
SARS-CoV-2 (100PFU) was incubated with an equal volume of Pre-IgY, S-2-IgY and Remdesivir in different concentration gradients in VeroE6 cells. The results showed that different doses of S-IgY had an obvious inhibitory effect on the cellular SARS-CoV-2 content (copy number) with EC50 of 27.78 ± 1.54 nM. Remdesivir’s EC50 against SARS-CoV-2 was 3259 ± 159.62 nM,
The inhibitory effect of S-IgY on SARS-Cov-2 replication was 106 times stronger more than that of Remdesivir In vitro (Fig.7.)."
They do not give values for how potent the Pre-IgY immunoglobulin is!