I had this shower thought last night. If you had enough satellites in the sky, you could broadcast certain bands of radio signal from the ground and use the shadows and distortions between the broadcast and the receiving satellites as a form of radar to watch for stealthy objects; it would allow for brief moments of detection, along with approximate vector calculation. If those satellites were also equipped with moderately high resolution cameras, the combination would allow detection and tracking of objects at any altitude.
Russia defeated the F-117 Nighthawk with X band radar, and I think a lot of aeronautical geeks have since dismissed "stealth" as useless. It's definitely not useless. The Nighthawk relied, in large part, on its tiny radar cross-section, and the technology was very rudimentary at the time. Despite how wasteful the military-industrial complex is, especially during peacetime, the amount of money put into stealth technology in the ensuing decades, is not simply a matter of waste. The Air Force would not spend twice as much time and money for every flight hour, for modern jets, like the F-35, if the stealth was entirely ineffective.
A lot of folks see these satellites as the Internet for the CBDC or digital ID, and I don't deny that they could also be used for those things. But I think that the bigger use case is as military technology, for battlefield communications and observation.
Just ask yourself, if I can think of this, what are the odds that DARPA and the military industrial complex didn't think of this. I've come up with some reasonably interesting military invention ideas over the years, but I'm certainly no competition to DARPA as a whole.
This isn't really a "conspiracy theory", since the military has always been engaged in designing and developing and deploying secret technology, and, if anything, it's a little bit of a white pill that the US could have a new leg up on the rest of the world when it comes to tracking missiles and stealth jets (versus the timeline where these satellites only serve nefarious globalist purposes).
interesting. The only scenario I think about, pertaining evidence of life out there, is the prospect of humans that left at some point.
Imagine thousands of years ago some humans escaped earth and went to Mars or some other place within our solar system, in an effort to survive some form of cataclysm (e.g., solar micronova). Now imagine they hadn't achieved a much greater degree of technology than where we are now, and so the ones who left didn't really have the technological means to come back; they simply left with the means to create a semi-permanent habitat somewhere in the solar system, perhaps on the other side of the moon, where they would avoid atmospheric effects of the nova and where they would be shielded by the earth in their timing. In that scenario, there would be this human civilization in the solar system that knew we were here, but which couldn't get back. Eventually, perhaps after even a single generation, failures and their planning would result in failure of their settlement, and there would just be artifacts left behind all these thousands of years later.