Are You Still Trusting The Science?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
That bullshit have nothing to do with science.
And yes, the only thing I trust is science. That is why I don't trust MSM, BigPharma, whatever.
you ARE the science.
No. I'm a scientist. That means if you state something, you should provide a replicateable and verifiable proof of your statement, that I could check by myself, independently. That was the main idea of sharing and publishing scientific papers - to allow other scientists to verify invention or discovery. Today that papers mostly just advertising or propaganda. Read about "replication crisis". Paper without replication by others means nothing in science. You could declare anything, but without independent validation it will be just bullshit.
Science that's not closely linked to engineering isn't particularly important. Even if Maxwell's equations turn out to be false, they still describe with pinpoint accuracy the functioning of electrical works and fiber optics.
It's become clear that when people talk about 'science/scientists', they're really talking about engineers.
Of course. To experiment you need a lot of engineering. In turn, engineering itself is implementation of science results.
If you remember history of science there was completely wrong theory of flogiston - kind of weightless matter that represent heat. Despite being wrong that theory perfectly allowed basic thermodynamics calculations.
Unfortunately, today when people talk about science/scientists, they talk about completely distorted and perverted imitation that was created by MSM and mass culture.
To do science, i.e. to study new things, you have to use previous results of science. To use them, you have to implement them for real. Implementing science results is engineering. So, to be a scientist you have to be engineer. To be an engineer you have to be a scientist.