Why do round earthers get so emotional, when someone doesn't agree with them?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
I've always found the ideas and points flat earthers made interesting. I don't know why people get so heated about it. I don't know why either side of the debate presents everything as a fact. We're here for conspiracy THEORIES. Present an idea as a theory, not a fact. I think it's great that people are questioning everything we have been taught from a young age. We live in a world of propaganda and lies. Some of the arguments are actually really good arguments.
I don't know if it is some kind of controlled opposition that dictates everyone has to insult each other constantly, or if people just act like that naturally. It definitely doesn't move the knowledge base anywhere when every comment is a series of juvenile expletive-filled insults.
It is usually shills/bots. They aren't interested in debate as they are incredibly vicious and mean.
They are ugly and offensive so that anyone reading or lurking psychologically doesn't want to be on the team being attacked. its an old and effective psychological tactic.
Example: if I said that I believe in Bigfoot, I would not get vicious ugly personal attacks on an actual conspiracy community.
Ideally there would be discussion, proofs on both sides, and then other unique theories about Bigfoot.
But with flat earth, it is someone asking a question or providing evidence, and getting downsized within seconds, with tons of accounts activated to launch personal attacks.
This will persuade on-lookers, some of whom will become anti-flat earthers themselves. And go on to mimic the attacks they saw. When all along it could have been bots or paid shills that started it.