In analyzing many things it is good to consider the differences between societies in older times, and now. When the world was simpler, maybe freemasonry had different aims. There is no question current freemasonry is corrupt and subverted, but maybe what it was at the time of the founding fathers was different.
Then really we should be asking what corrupted the forces of they were once different. Also, if a group is corrupted it is not necessarily bad - because the symbols are changed and it's not the group, the name maybe but not the aims. So we really should acknowledge that and not ignore such impacts
In analyzing many things it is good to consider the differences between societies in older times, and now. When the world was simpler, maybe freemasonry had different aims. There is no question current freemasonry is corrupt and subverted, but maybe what it was at the time of the founding fathers was different.
Then really we should be asking what corrupted the forces of they were once different. Also, if a group is corrupted it is not necessarily bad - because the symbols are changed and it's not the group, the name maybe but not the aims. So we really should acknowledge that and not ignore such impacts