Artemis doesn't approach the earth in a straight line, it follows an arched trajectory gradually getting lower/closer to the earth. If it is travelling in the same direction as the rotation of the planet, then depending on artemus speed the planet's spin would be relatively imperceptible . Also the compressed nature of the footage needs to be taken into account. Perhaps some small movement is detectable in the raw footage.
Like I said, even if the footage is fake they would be likely to account for this and have the footage show it - ie. have it show the planet hardly moving, if at all.
Alright dude if that's what you perceive, so be it. What I plainly see is daylight not moving relative to terrain features on earth. If you shine a light on a soccer ball and the angle doesn't change relative to the hexagons on the ball, it doesn't matter how I approach the ball. I would be able to see the lit side of the ball is unchanging. Live in whatever reality you want man.
Sorry buddy, I believe in objective truth. You guys construct a fantasy built from "FE proofs". But don't worry, that's it from me. I'm not engaging with this stuff again.
I dont see how you are objective, from what I can tell you are a globe and artemis believer by default. I am biased for FE, but I had to overcome a lifetime of sci-fi brainwashing to get there.
PS this wasn't a FE proof, I just said artemis is fake like the globe.
The diagram here shows potentially why the earth would not appear to be spinning in the footage (whether is was real, or faked to look real):
https://curiosmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Artemis-I-NASA-The-Trajectory-scaled.jpg
Artemis doesn't approach the earth in a straight line, it follows an arched trajectory gradually getting lower/closer to the earth. If it is travelling in the same direction as the rotation of the planet, then depending on artemus speed the planet's spin would be relatively imperceptible . Also the compressed nature of the footage needs to be taken into account. Perhaps some small movement is detectable in the raw footage.
Like I said, even if the footage is fake they would be likely to account for this and have the footage show it - ie. have it show the planet hardly moving, if at all.
Alright dude if that's what you perceive, so be it. What I plainly see is daylight not moving relative to terrain features on earth. If you shine a light on a soccer ball and the angle doesn't change relative to the hexagons on the ball, it doesn't matter how I approach the ball. I would be able to see the lit side of the ball is unchanging. Live in whatever reality you want man.
Sorry buddy, I believe in objective truth. You guys construct a fantasy built from "FE proofs". But don't worry, that's it from me. I'm not engaging with this stuff again.
I dont see how you are objective, from what I can tell you are a globe and artemis believer by default. I am biased for FE, but I had to overcome a lifetime of sci-fi brainwashing to get there.
PS this wasn't a FE proof, I just said artemis is fake like the globe.
Run away from the truth.