Here’s a rare conspiracy most people haven’t heard of. I read it from Rothschilds 2009 Q&A called “I am rofschild, axe me a question”.
Rothschild (red shield of Rome) knows a lot because he is literally the guardian of the Roman Empire and manages their money.
He said back in ancient times, humans instinctively and intuitively knew stuff until the Egyptian devil cult government created language with the intention to create mass separation of concepts. Before, humans saw all of Life as One but by naming stuff, they slowly began seeing things as totally separate and independent objects or people.
This isn’t true because a tree becomes a chair then becomes a fire and then becomes ashes and then ashes become part of the Earth which can then become almost anything including part of the food that is eaten by a mother to produce another baby human. Everything is all mega system but to confuse the People, the Egyptians created language.
Some might say verbal language is necessary but in the future we will all use visual telepathy to speak which means images (not words). Our intuition always plays a part and figures things out for us but more so without language.
So by creating language, the deep state put humans a step back from full blown telepathy which is a much easier form of communication.
Also, Social Media is tech assisted telepathy. It has primed our mind to do telepathy meaning if it was ever shut down, humans would discover telepathy. This is 1 reason why they can’t shut down the internet.
My study shows that the mind of God holds all concepts which we can think of and being into reality.
Thought turns into ether. Ether turns into plasma. Plasma turns into the 4 elements.
Why do feeemasons like 33?
Plasma might also refer to what you say but I’m referring to another material that forms the 4 elements.
Plasma is a portion of our blood too.
a) what does nature withhold from those within?
b) doesn't being able to perceive imply being within everything perceivable impressing upon one for expression?
c) what if everything gives, while everyone is being tempted to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to adapt to that which keeps on giving?
d) what if the suggested brand "God" tempts one to want to hold onto (suggested), while ignoring that which keeps on giving (perceivable)?
I’m not sure what you are asking. Can you rephrase?
a) how does holding onto fit into the concept of a giver?
b) does a mind/memory need to hold onto, or would the want to hold onto slow down the processing speed of the memory?
c) if all is held within mind, then how could there be more of all outside mind?