Zap made a couple posts today that got me thinking about 5G again, so I figured I would make a post.

I am extremely worried about the EMF from 5G towers alone (let alone the weakening magnetic field implications that Zap mentioned).

I've got to TriField TF2 and a GQ EMF-390, and while I've seen people on the Internet detail some of the problems with the former's ability to accurately measure low to moderate amounts of EMF, without greatly exaggerating, I can attest to the fact that one can at least use these consumer priced meters to measure relative EMF radiation, barring some gross underestimation of the calculus involved pertaining the length of the antenna and the wave length of the offending radiation.

For example, I can put my TF2 next to a router and take average measurements while moving it around the router at a very close range (1-3 inches) while the router is doing work (playing an HD video on a connected device 50 feet away), and then I can use that measurement as a "you definitely don't wanna be in this much EMF" benchmark, knowing that having that router right next to you would represent levels that are absolutely within the ranges shown, in multiple studies, to have drastic effects on your health, assuming you are in this territory on a long-term basis (for example, putting your head 3 inches in front of your router for an hour is not going to kill you, but doing so for years probably will, one way or another).

Using that router benchmark, I am able to compare that against ambient EMF in residential areas that have a large 5G tower nearby, and I can tell you, for certain, that you do not want to be living within a quarter mile of one of the large multi-array towers. The inverse square law pertaining to three-dimensional dispersion does not apply to these types of towers, and the reason is because they do not disperse equally in three dimensions; they each contain a series of targeted arrays, and each of these arrays targets a cone, so once you get a couple hundred yards away from it you are most likely well within the range of one or more of these cones. The levels of EMF that I've measured, depending on the distance from the tower, have ranged from 1/4 of the level to 3x the level of EMF measured directly next to a router. 1/4 doesn't seem like a lot until you imagine being in that environment for 10 years, and it's only getting worse as they had more towers.

The smaller towers, the ones that don't have visible array on the outside, that look kind of like a solid metal dildo sticking off the top of the telephone pole or light pole, they project equal or greater amounts of EMF than do the multi-array towers, but they appear to project equally in three dimensions, or perhaps in a circle horizontally; Either way, if you've got one of these, but it's 300 feet or further away, you are probably OK.

I would also add my own conjecture that I do believe some of these arrays contain phased array targeting capabilities, but I have no proof of this.