Anytime someone in a community like this starts talking about arbitrary age of consent laws and wants to get into a moral debate about a hypothetical 15 year old girl, like they have some nuance by comparing today to historical eras or some shit like that, they are indeed a shill.
You can make a case for 16-18 year olds marrying other 16-18 year olds easy enough. I don't think most here would have an issue with that. The particular brand of shill infesting conpro happen to be largely 30+ men that want to be with 13 year olds. Their arguments don't make sense.
Not new at all, they've done this for ages. Notice the pedo shills for a recent example
Yep.
Anytime someone in a community like this starts talking about arbitrary age of consent laws and wants to get into a moral debate about a hypothetical 15 year old girl, like they have some nuance by comparing today to historical eras or some shit like that, they are indeed a shill.
You can make a case for 16-18 year olds marrying other 16-18 year olds easy enough. I don't think most here would have an issue with that. The particular brand of shill infesting conpro happen to be largely 30+ men that want to be with 13 year olds. Their arguments don't make sense.
Agree.
This sounds like precisely the logic employed by the degenerate Queer Theorists, and Critical Theorists generally.
They are going for the inevitable merger.