Living within the process of dying implies being form (life) IM (within) MEDIATE (middle) of flow (inception towards death), hence within motion. Suggesting the "cessation of motion" (stop) ignores perceivable reality. Furthermore...the choice to shape a suggestion within perceivable implies being choice at the center of balance aka need (perceivable) or want (suggested)...immediate (choice) momentum (balance) of motion.
doctors
DOCTOR, noun [Latin, to teach.]...self discernment within perceivable cannot be taught by suggestions from others, yet consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable.
I dont believe in the truth value of his statements
a) both believing vs not believing and truth vs false represents reasoning about suggested information from others...a conflict shaped by consenting to what others are suggesting.
b) choosing to want or not want suggested (information) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable (inspiration).
c) living within the process of dying implies evaluation (reaction of partial) within value (enacting whole). One (perceiving) can be tempted to ignore value (perceivable) for suggested values by others, which when consented to, gives others the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested values at will.
d) the state of mind (Latin ment; mens) implies within motion, hence reacting to perceivable input (inspiration). Others tempt one to restrict the mind to suggested information (affixed meaning), while ignoring adaptation to perceivable inspiration (moving meaning).
really abuse linguistics
The few suggest words to tempt the many to ignore perceivable sound aka spell-craft aka the few crafting the spelling of the consenting many by means of suggested fiction (word) over perceivable reality (sound).
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by, out of and therefore in response to perceivable sound.
I like playing with words
Others suggest you words to play with, while you ignore to resonate with perceivable sound, which represents your willing choice of dissonance (want) over resonance (need).
Self discernment implies by oneself within perceivable...not by agreeing with what others are suggesting.
Why is it that teaching a dog words is called domestication; while teaching humans languages is called civilization? Totally unrelated to that...why are the many being dominated by the few and why do civilizations keep collapsing?
abuse...to turn
What if the free will of choice to abuse implies being within a momentum (balance) which allows one to make turns?
How is it that you have the choice to go left/right; up/down; front/back...while being moved as life from inception towards death? How could form (life) have free will of choice of direction within a flow (inception towards death) which implies one direction?
tl; dr...tell me about the essence of words...where do words originate from...what represents the foundation to shape words out of?
Curiously... it's not. If you look through its history, there are few 'normal' comments in there. Maybe it's been replaced by a bot. Can't say for certain.
Living within the process of dying implies being form (life) IM (within) MEDIATE (middle) of flow (inception towards death), hence within motion. Suggesting the "cessation of motion" (stop) ignores perceivable reality. Furthermore...the choice to shape a suggestion within perceivable implies being choice at the center of balance aka need (perceivable) or want (suggested)...immediate (choice) momentum (balance) of motion.
DOCTOR, noun [Latin, to teach.]...self discernment within perceivable cannot be taught by suggestions from others, yet consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable.
a) both believing vs not believing and truth vs false represents reasoning about suggested information from others...a conflict shaped by consenting to what others are suggesting.
b) choosing to want or not want suggested (information) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable (inspiration).
c) living within the process of dying implies evaluation (reaction of partial) within value (enacting whole). One (perceiving) can be tempted to ignore value (perceivable) for suggested values by others, which when consented to, gives others the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested values at will.
d) the state of mind (Latin ment; mens) implies within motion, hence reacting to perceivable input (inspiration). Others tempt one to restrict the mind to suggested information (affixed meaning), while ignoring adaptation to perceivable inspiration (moving meaning).
The few suggest words to tempt the many to ignore perceivable sound aka spell-craft aka the few crafting the spelling of the consenting many by means of suggested fiction (word) over perceivable reality (sound).
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by, out of and therefore in response to perceivable sound.
Others suggest you words to play with, while you ignore to resonate with perceivable sound, which represents your willing choice of dissonance (want) over resonance (need).
Self discernment implies by oneself within perceivable...not by agreeing with what others are suggesting.
Why is it that teaching a dog words is called domestication; while teaching humans languages is called civilization? Totally unrelated to that...why are the many being dominated by the few and why do civilizations keep collapsing?
What if the free will of choice to abuse implies being within a momentum (balance) which allows one to make turns?
How is it that you have the choice to go left/right; up/down; front/back...while being moved as life from inception towards death? How could form (life) have free will of choice of direction within a flow (inception towards death) which implies one direction?
tl; dr...tell me about the essence of words...where do words originate from...what represents the foundation to shape words out of?
Curiously... it's not. If you look through its history, there are few 'normal' comments in there. Maybe it's been replaced by a bot. Can't say for certain.