Living within the process of dying implies being form (life) IM (within) MEDIATE (middle) of flow (inception towards death), hence within motion. Suggesting the "cessation of motion" (stop) ignores perceivable reality. Furthermore...the choice to shape a suggestion within perceivable implies being choice at the center of balance aka need (perceivable) or want (suggested)...immediate (choice) momentum (balance) of motion.
doctors
DOCTOR, noun [Latin, to teach.]...self discernment within perceivable cannot be taught by suggestions from others, yet consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable.
I dont believe in the truth value of his statements
a) both believing vs not believing and truth vs false represents reasoning about suggested information from others...a conflict shaped by consenting to what others are suggesting.
b) choosing to want or not want suggested (information) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable (inspiration).
c) living within the process of dying implies evaluation (reaction of partial) within value (enacting whole). One (perceiving) can be tempted to ignore value (perceivable) for suggested values by others, which when consented to, gives others the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested values at will.
d) the state of mind (Latin ment; mens) implies within motion, hence reacting to perceivable input (inspiration). Others tempt one to restrict the mind to suggested information (affixed meaning), while ignoring adaptation to perceivable inspiration (moving meaning).
really abuse linguistics
The few suggest words to tempt the many to ignore perceivable sound aka spell-craft aka the few crafting the spelling of the consenting many by means of suggested fiction (word) over perceivable reality (sound).
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by, out of and therefore in response to perceivable sound.
I like playing with words
Others suggest you words to play with, while you ignore to resonate with perceivable sound, which represents your willing choice of dissonance (want) over resonance (need).
Self discernment implies by oneself within perceivable...not by agreeing with what others are suggesting.
Why is it that teaching a dog words is called domestication; while teaching humans languages is called civilization? Totally unrelated to that...why are the many being dominated by the few and why do civilizations keep collapsing?
abuse...to turn
What if the free will of choice to abuse implies being within a momentum (balance) which allows one to make turns?
How is it that you have the choice to go left/right; up/down; front/back...while being moved as life from inception towards death? How could form (life) have free will of choice of direction within a flow (inception towards death) which implies one direction?
tl; dr...tell me about the essence of words...where do words originate from...what represents the foundation to shape words out of?
Understanding represents "standing under" suggested information, while ignoring to grow within perceivable inspiration. As growth (living) within loss (process of dying) one doesn't need to stand under others; one needs resist "shrinking".
better; disagree; like; yes
Better vs worse; agree vs disagree; like vs not dislike; yes vs no...all represent a rebranding for your choice to want vs not want suggested information. Others use suggestion to tempt you into these conflicts called "reasoning".
You represent choice within balance (need/want) and your choice to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested) puts you into imbalance (want vs not want).
Instead of reasoning (want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement etc.) over suggested information, try to utilize implication (if/then) while adapting to perceivable inspiration.
I liked some of the ideas
IDE'A, noun [Latin video; to see.] - "whatever the mind perceives in itself"...not what others are suggesting. The difference is that what one perceives represents predefined input, hence not giving a shit if you like or dislike it, while the suggested tempts one into the like vs dislike conflict of reason against others. While one reasons with others about liking or disliking suggested information; one ignores the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
want to know
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" represents need; while suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka INTER (being within) LEGO (collecting) implies want.
One needs to grow comprehension within perceivable, while resisting the temptation to want to understand suggested.
have the same words but in some cases the meanings were too far apart
a) what if perceivable sound represents predefined meaning; while suggested words represent an overlay, allowing those who suggest it to define; redefine and contradict meaning at will for all those consenting to it?
b) what if you represents the partial (living) within the whole (process of dying)?
c) what if everything perceivable (inspiration) represents a partial (moving differences), while others suggest sameness to distract one from it?
d) what if same meaning (process of dying) generates different perspectives (living)?
language translations between different tongues
Different words shaped out of same sound...by free will of choice. That implies reaction (word) within enacting (sound). It's on oneself to discern between origin (cause) and substitute (effect)...
...is there...are here
Differentiation (partial) can only exist within sameness (whole), while -tion (through action) implies motion, hence a self differentiation of whole (process of dying) into partial (living) through momentum, which the partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable) perceives as the ever changing moment (um).
Instead of trying to define what is there and what is here, how about growing discernment about ones perspective in-between here and there? Use whatever "here" you choose, while adapting to whatever "there" you choose, as inspiration (moving differences) for adaptation as perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole).
The more the partial adapts to being moved by the whole; the more about the whole the partial comprehends. All of perceivable reality is already there; each perceiving one within lacks comprehension thereof...this in return allows temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (dying).
alone is too much
Suggested "alone" tempts "one" to ignore comprehensible "ALL(in)ONE", which requires adaptation of one (perceiving) to all (perceivable).
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one"...for all represents one in energy. Agreeing with that doesn't represent discerning it by oneself, but it can be discerned if one resists the temptation to agree or disagree with others.
Perceivable reality (whole) isn't too much for those perceiving it (partials) from within. Living can handle whatever the process of dying offers. All restrictions are self imposed, because nature sets free (will of choice).
the symbolic is literal but its also not literal in a direct paradox with no explanation.
a) the few suggest symbolism to tempt the many to ignore symmetry aka affixed information (symbol) or moving inspiration (symmetry)...it's your free will of choice to utilize.
b) LIT'ERAL, adjective [Latin litera, a letter.]...what letter does perceivable reality communicate to those perceiving it from within? Does nature publish any books?
Sleight of hand:
"And the vision that was planted in my brain (suggested information)...Still remains (consent to uphold suggested)...Within the sound of silence (within ignored inspiration)"
"exit light" (exit comprehension) "enter night" (enter ignorance) "take my hand" (consent to my suggestion) "and we're off to never-neverland" (ignored potential it is).
c) expression (living growth) within impressing (process of dying aka loss)...no explanations by others needed. Instead it goes impression (perceivable) to compression (comprehension) for expression (growth)...or repression (loss) if ignored.
d) "direct paradox"...one represents the reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death); while suggested PAR'ADOX, noun [Greek beyond, and opinion; to or suppose.] tempts one to ignore within for beyond.
it would make more sense
One senses react to everything (perceivable) enacting upon the perceiving one. It's about growing comprehension about what one senses, not about the want for more sense.
Those who want more ignore the need to adapt to everything already offered.
overpopulation
How could a partial overpopulate the whole? How could the ingredient overpopulate the base? How could energy be overpopulated from within itself? For something to burst outwards it has to be (partial) inside (whole)...
Both overpopulation and extinction are suggested by the few to tempt the many to ignore being reactors (living) within a generator (process of dying) aka finite reactors within infinite generation. Consenting to the suggested represses the potential of the finite within infinite potentiality perceived.
Choose to take a step outside of the suggested pen and you'll notice that the consenting many are allowing themselves to be herded like cattle by the suggestions of the few.
none of this was ever discussed
DISCUSS, verb - "to drive; to beat or to shake in pieces; to separate by beating or shaking; to disperse; to scatter; to dissolve" + -TION (through action)...that represents you as the dissolved (living) within the solvent (process of dying), which implies the need for you to struggle for self sustenance (living) before being dissolved (dying).
Others suggest you with words that "discuss" means "to debate; agitate by argument; illustrate truth; examine by disputation; reason on; separating truth from falsehood etc.
I simply point out the revisionism done ( https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Discuss ) and my perspective (comprehension) of the perceivable origin (sound) which the idols (words) were shaped out of...which in return grows my comprehension. What others are doing with this represents their free will of choice.
I understand almost everything
Standing under suggested aside...one (partial) cannot ever comprehend everything (whole); because everything represents ongoing (loss), while each one within represents temporary (growth).
Growth can only ever be temporary, while the fall of everything grown goes on..."and on, on and on and the beat don't stop until the break of dawn"
its fucking curse
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestions) contract law represents the curse one signs and which allows others to overburden ones memory with suggested information, hence consenting to torment self with suggestions by others.
Memory needs to be used like a ram (adaptation to inspiration), yet is tempted to be misused like a hard-drive (accumulation of information)...resisting the temptation to want to hold onto; opens up one access to needed inspiration to grow into...an access (comprehension) oneself willingly represses (ignorance).
In short...instead of reasoning about suggested information (always a conflict aka loss)...adapt to as much as you can as perceivable inspiration (always an effort aka growth).
Resistance is fertile...
I enjoy the word games for the word games because idk why.
Because there's always more perceivable potentiality (sound) underneath suggested potential (word) aka "more than meets the eye".
A suggested game implies your wanted (win) vs not wanted (lose) outcome, which both tempt you to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
The sleigh of hand for gaming is "game over" aka different games; same outcome...a suggested inversion of being different (living) within sameness (process of dying), hence the need for response to origin, while resisting the temptation of outcome. Others are playing your consent with their suggestions.
im not so easily influenced
IN (being within) FLU'ENT (flow) aka being form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...pretty easy to ignore for the suggested "currencies" by others.
my mind is a fortress
FOR'TRESS, noun - "a stronghold" aka your want to hold onto suggested tempting you to not want to share" aka greed to envy. Meanwhile; a MIND (Greek memory) represents a temporary tool for adaptation to ongoing input (inspiration) aka IN (being within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of form to flow) -ATION (through action)...in short...reaction to enacting.
The more one opens up to perceivable; the more ones resistance to suggested grows. Your mind represents a sandcastle choosing to ignore the water dissolving it. How are sandcastles build? With wet sand! You need the water; yet are tempted by the flow thereof. It's never about what you build; but about that you continue to build, while being dissolved.
i prefer instrumental music
INSTRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind)...form (living) represents the instrument played by flow (inception towards death), while having the temporary choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want) within ongoing sound. Resonance sustains the instrument...
Others suggest instruments (plural) to tempt one to ignore oneself as the instrument (singular). Just like with weapons...the only weapon of choice represents free will of choice.
What could the temporary (living) own that the ongoing (process of dying) doesn't take back? Furthermore, was it ever owned by the temporary if the ongoing never let go of it? In other words partial implies still being connected within whole...
What if the few suggest the many to want to own suggested values like "money", which when consented to allows the few to define; redefine and contradict the suggested values?
to do
To be (living) implies being done by (process of dying).
word game splits
a) I adapt to what inspires; not to what others suggest.
b) partial (word) implies split within whole (sound) aka differentiation of ongoing into temporary.
c) life ain't a game for outcomes; it represents the price within origin.
retarded
RET'ARD, verb - "to diminish the velocity of motion"...can resistance (life) diminish velocity (inception towards death) or only temporarily grow self within the momentum of ongoing velocity?
Curiously... it's not. If you look through its history, there are few 'normal' comments in there. Maybe it's been replaced by a bot. Can't say for certain.
we burned the towers when they put them up here
This is the example many should be following.
Living within the process of dying implies being form (life) IM (within) MEDIATE (middle) of flow (inception towards death), hence within motion. Suggesting the "cessation of motion" (stop) ignores perceivable reality. Furthermore...the choice to shape a suggestion within perceivable implies being choice at the center of balance aka need (perceivable) or want (suggested)...immediate (choice) momentum (balance) of motion.
DOCTOR, noun [Latin, to teach.]...self discernment within perceivable cannot be taught by suggestions from others, yet consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable.
a) both believing vs not believing and truth vs false represents reasoning about suggested information from others...a conflict shaped by consenting to what others are suggesting.
b) choosing to want or not want suggested (information) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable (inspiration).
c) living within the process of dying implies evaluation (reaction of partial) within value (enacting whole). One (perceiving) can be tempted to ignore value (perceivable) for suggested values by others, which when consented to, gives others the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested values at will.
d) the state of mind (Latin ment; mens) implies within motion, hence reacting to perceivable input (inspiration). Others tempt one to restrict the mind to suggested information (affixed meaning), while ignoring adaptation to perceivable inspiration (moving meaning).
The few suggest words to tempt the many to ignore perceivable sound aka spell-craft aka the few crafting the spelling of the consenting many by means of suggested fiction (word) over perceivable reality (sound).
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by, out of and therefore in response to perceivable sound.
Others suggest you words to play with, while you ignore to resonate with perceivable sound, which represents your willing choice of dissonance (want) over resonance (need).
Self discernment implies by oneself within perceivable...not by agreeing with what others are suggesting.
Why is it that teaching a dog words is called domestication; while teaching humans languages is called civilization? Totally unrelated to that...why are the many being dominated by the few and why do civilizations keep collapsing?
What if the free will of choice to abuse implies being within a momentum (balance) which allows one to make turns?
How is it that you have the choice to go left/right; up/down; front/back...while being moved as life from inception towards death? How could form (life) have free will of choice of direction within a flow (inception towards death) which implies one direction?
tl; dr...tell me about the essence of words...where do words originate from...what represents the foundation to shape words out of?
Understanding represents "standing under" suggested information, while ignoring to grow within perceivable inspiration. As growth (living) within loss (process of dying) one doesn't need to stand under others; one needs resist "shrinking".
Better vs worse; agree vs disagree; like vs not dislike; yes vs no...all represent a rebranding for your choice to want vs not want suggested information. Others use suggestion to tempt you into these conflicts called "reasoning".
You represent choice within balance (need/want) and your choice to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested) puts you into imbalance (want vs not want).
Instead of reasoning (want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement etc.) over suggested information, try to utilize implication (if/then) while adapting to perceivable inspiration.
IDE'A, noun [Latin video; to see.] - "whatever the mind perceives in itself"...not what others are suggesting. The difference is that what one perceives represents predefined input, hence not giving a shit if you like or dislike it, while the suggested tempts one into the like vs dislike conflict of reason against others. While one reasons with others about liking or disliking suggested information; one ignores the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" represents need; while suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka INTER (being within) LEGO (collecting) implies want.
One needs to grow comprehension within perceivable, while resisting the temptation to want to understand suggested.
a) what if perceivable sound represents predefined meaning; while suggested words represent an overlay, allowing those who suggest it to define; redefine and contradict meaning at will for all those consenting to it?
b) what if you represents the partial (living) within the whole (process of dying)?
c) what if everything perceivable (inspiration) represents a partial (moving differences), while others suggest sameness to distract one from it?
d) what if same meaning (process of dying) generates different perspectives (living)?
Different words shaped out of same sound...by free will of choice. That implies reaction (word) within enacting (sound). It's on oneself to discern between origin (cause) and substitute (effect)...
Differentiation (partial) can only exist within sameness (whole), while -tion (through action) implies motion, hence a self differentiation of whole (process of dying) into partial (living) through momentum, which the partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable) perceives as the ever changing moment (um).
Instead of trying to define what is there and what is here, how about growing discernment about ones perspective in-between here and there? Use whatever "here" you choose, while adapting to whatever "there" you choose, as inspiration (moving differences) for adaptation as perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole).
The more the partial adapts to being moved by the whole; the more about the whole the partial comprehends. All of perceivable reality is already there; each perceiving one within lacks comprehension thereof...this in return allows temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (dying).
Suggested "alone" tempts "one" to ignore comprehensible "ALL(in)ONE", which requires adaptation of one (perceiving) to all (perceivable).
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one"...for all represents one in energy. Agreeing with that doesn't represent discerning it by oneself, but it can be discerned if one resists the temptation to agree or disagree with others.
Perceivable reality (whole) isn't too much for those perceiving it (partials) from within. Living can handle whatever the process of dying offers. All restrictions are self imposed, because nature sets free (will of choice).
a) the few suggest symbolism to tempt the many to ignore symmetry aka affixed information (symbol) or moving inspiration (symmetry)...it's your free will of choice to utilize.
b) LIT'ERAL, adjective [Latin litera, a letter.]...what letter does perceivable reality communicate to those perceiving it from within? Does nature publish any books?
Sleight of hand:
"And the vision that was planted in my brain (suggested information)...Still remains (consent to uphold suggested)...Within the sound of silence (within ignored inspiration)"
"exit light" (exit comprehension) "enter night" (enter ignorance) "take my hand" (consent to my suggestion) "and we're off to never-neverland" (ignored potential it is).
c) expression (living growth) within impressing (process of dying aka loss)...no explanations by others needed. Instead it goes impression (perceivable) to compression (comprehension) for expression (growth)...or repression (loss) if ignored.
d) "direct paradox"...one represents the reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death); while suggested PAR'ADOX, noun [Greek beyond, and opinion; to or suppose.] tempts one to ignore within for beyond.
One senses react to everything (perceivable) enacting upon the perceiving one. It's about growing comprehension about what one senses, not about the want for more sense.
Those who want more ignore the need to adapt to everything already offered.
How could a partial overpopulate the whole? How could the ingredient overpopulate the base? How could energy be overpopulated from within itself? For something to burst outwards it has to be (partial) inside (whole)...
Both overpopulation and extinction are suggested by the few to tempt the many to ignore being reactors (living) within a generator (process of dying) aka finite reactors within infinite generation. Consenting to the suggested represses the potential of the finite within infinite potentiality perceived.
Choose to take a step outside of the suggested pen and you'll notice that the consenting many are allowing themselves to be herded like cattle by the suggestions of the few.
DISCUSS, verb - "to drive; to beat or to shake in pieces; to separate by beating or shaking; to disperse; to scatter; to dissolve" + -TION (through action)...that represents you as the dissolved (living) within the solvent (process of dying), which implies the need for you to struggle for self sustenance (living) before being dissolved (dying).
Others suggest you with words that "discuss" means "to debate; agitate by argument; illustrate truth; examine by disputation; reason on; separating truth from falsehood etc.
I simply point out the revisionism done ( https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Discuss ) and my perspective (comprehension) of the perceivable origin (sound) which the idols (words) were shaped out of...which in return grows my comprehension. What others are doing with this represents their free will of choice.
Standing under suggested aside...one (partial) cannot ever comprehend everything (whole); because everything represents ongoing (loss), while each one within represents temporary (growth).
Growth can only ever be temporary, while the fall of everything grown goes on..."and on, on and on and the beat don't stop until the break of dawn"
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestions) contract law represents the curse one signs and which allows others to overburden ones memory with suggested information, hence consenting to torment self with suggestions by others.
Memory needs to be used like a ram (adaptation to inspiration), yet is tempted to be misused like a hard-drive (accumulation of information)...resisting the temptation to want to hold onto; opens up one access to needed inspiration to grow into...an access (comprehension) oneself willingly represses (ignorance).
In short...instead of reasoning about suggested information (always a conflict aka loss)...adapt to as much as you can as perceivable inspiration (always an effort aka growth).
Resistance is fertile...
Because there's always more perceivable potentiality (sound) underneath suggested potential (word) aka "more than meets the eye".
A suggested game implies your wanted (win) vs not wanted (lose) outcome, which both tempt you to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
The sleigh of hand for gaming is "game over" aka different games; same outcome...a suggested inversion of being different (living) within sameness (process of dying), hence the need for response to origin, while resisting the temptation of outcome. Others are playing your consent with their suggestions.
IN (being within) FLU'ENT (flow) aka being form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...pretty easy to ignore for the suggested "currencies" by others.
FOR'TRESS, noun - "a stronghold" aka your want to hold onto suggested tempting you to not want to share" aka greed to envy. Meanwhile; a MIND (Greek memory) represents a temporary tool for adaptation to ongoing input (inspiration) aka IN (being within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of form to flow) -ATION (through action)...in short...reaction to enacting.
The more one opens up to perceivable; the more ones resistance to suggested grows. Your mind represents a sandcastle choosing to ignore the water dissolving it. How are sandcastles build? With wet sand! You need the water; yet are tempted by the flow thereof. It's never about what you build; but about that you continue to build, while being dissolved.
INSTRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind)...form (living) represents the instrument played by flow (inception towards death), while having the temporary choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want) within ongoing sound. Resonance sustains the instrument...
Others suggest instruments (plural) to tempt one to ignore oneself as the instrument (singular). Just like with weapons...the only weapon of choice represents free will of choice.
What could the temporary (living) own that the ongoing (process of dying) doesn't take back? Furthermore, was it ever owned by the temporary if the ongoing never let go of it? In other words partial implies still being connected within whole...
What if the few suggest the many to want to own suggested values like "money", which when consented to allows the few to define; redefine and contradict the suggested values?
To be (living) implies being done by (process of dying).
a) I adapt to what inspires; not to what others suggest.
b) partial (word) implies split within whole (sound) aka differentiation of ongoing into temporary.
c) life ain't a game for outcomes; it represents the price within origin.
RET'ARD, verb - "to diminish the velocity of motion"...can resistance (life) diminish velocity (inception towards death) or only temporarily grow self within the momentum of ongoing velocity?
Curiously... it's not. If you look through its history, there are few 'normal' comments in there. Maybe it's been replaced by a bot. Can't say for certain.
That makes sense. When I said that there were a few normal comments... I meant two or three.