then you should discard it if it is presented as something without the proper context or source material. I saw this posted on Elusive Truths Youtube channel. I asked him the source so I could be confident in posssibly sharing it and his response to me was 'does the source matter'.
I said it is perhaps thee single most important thing in this day and age.
The video may be exactly what they describe. It may not. Lets see the original source. Until we have that, you shouldn't spread this around as proof of ANYTHING. The insinuations and assumptions that one must hold in order to believe that this is what it is being presented as are far too weighty to justify accepting it without that proof.
Again, it might be exacly what it is declared to be, but you should always be wary of anyone who offers you out of context snippets and tries to provide their own narrative on what it represents. Thats got to be disinfo 101. They are appealing to the preconditioned belief that ritual child sacrifice is being exposed. There's no reason to keep the original source under wraps if they are being honest. There IS reason to keep it under wraps if it is the targeted manipulation/misrepresentation of info.
What is your deal? I'm asking a question 'Has this been debunked' and you write like I'm spreading lies.. and to discard.. What kind shill reply is that?
I'm asking you.. I dunno, the rumble channel is Q anon Hopium bullshit.. but this video is interesting.. and nothing else about it.
found it in the rumble comments. It's the Donnafugata Theatre https://www.tripadvisor.com.sg/Attraction_Review-g194872-d5050133-Reviews-Teatro_Donnafugata-Ragusa_Province_of_Ragusa_Sicily.html
then you should discard it if it is presented as something without the proper context or source material. I saw this posted on Elusive Truths Youtube channel. I asked him the source so I could be confident in posssibly sharing it and his response to me was 'does the source matter'. I said it is perhaps thee single most important thing in this day and age.
The video may be exactly what they describe. It may not. Lets see the original source. Until we have that, you shouldn't spread this around as proof of ANYTHING. The insinuations and assumptions that one must hold in order to believe that this is what it is being presented as are far too weighty to justify accepting it without that proof.
Again, it might be exacly what it is declared to be, but you should always be wary of anyone who offers you out of context snippets and tries to provide their own narrative on what it represents. Thats got to be disinfo 101. They are appealing to the preconditioned belief that ritual child sacrifice is being exposed. There's no reason to keep the original source under wraps if they are being honest. There IS reason to keep it under wraps if it is the targeted manipulation/misrepresentation of info.
What is your deal? I'm asking a question 'Has this been debunked' and you write like I'm spreading lies.. and to discard.. What kind shill reply is that?
here's the original video
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5WVr39CDXjM